Development and Planning Commission living in the stone age

The Development and Planning Commission is acting in a fashion as erratic as the general concept of planning and development in Gibraltar these days.

After months and months of a major controversy, the DPC has issued its decision on the proposed funicular project. And pinned the whole document in an office in Europort hoping someone would go over to read it.

Someone could have tipped off some in the media about it, or supplied it with a copy or a reporter may have decided to spend his days and nights on a bunk bed outside the office in case an official sneaks out to pin the latest decisions from the DPC.

CONTROVERSY

Such decisions are meant for public consumption, moreso a decision concerning a controversy over the funicular which had been raging for months on end.

It would have dawned on any child of nursery age that this was an issue of great public interest - and hence the public at large needed to be informed.

It is clear that the DPC is in a state of chaos, perhaps so full of self-importance that their better judgment gets clouded.

The DPC appears not to have realised that they are there to provide a public service, and some official or other, or some minister or other, must be responsible for properly organising its public relations.

While the funicular was a major issue, requiring special treatment, there is no doubt that the DPC should urgently revise its procedures and modernise its old-fashioned ways. We are living in a technologically-advanced age for systems and procedures to follow suit, and not be enmeshed in methods more in keeping with the stone age.

PUBLIC INTEREST

As a matter of course, shortly after any decsion is taken by the DPC, the media should be informed so that the public at large can be duly informed about matters which are of great public interest.
 

Will it all end en el toilet del Quarry?

Cynthia mia, que me dijo mi amiga Mariquita en ! Sandy Bay ayer that el Chief Minestra y un Leon fueron a Torremolinos a planchar.

My dear Cloti, I don't know if there was a planchaso, pero as I understand it they went there to 'iron out' their difficulties, or don't you have the GCSE in English? Esta bien, no te mosquees conmigo, all I was doing was telling you lo que me dijo Mariquita.

Mind you, el otro dia sacaron una maquina en Sandy Bay capaz de planchar a cualquiera, pero that's something else.

Okay, pero esta gente se están dando unas comelonas at our expense , porque in July se fueron a hablar about our Gibraltar en un luxury hotel in the Al-garve, ahora se van a comer a un restaurante en Torremolinos which I am sure was not un chiringuito, will the next round of talks take place en un bar en la Atunara?

Que agudo. Mientras no termine todo en el toilet del Quarry que no tiene ni agua!

What a way to discuss our future, my dear. I hope que no se lo estén tomando a cachonfinger, porque ellos se chupan los dedos after eating un buen potaje y nosotros out here escamao que no se vayan a meter in our airport.

I don't know, los rumours are que quieren hacer

un túnel como el del Casemates to link up our terminal con un secret building which the Spaniards are to build in La Linea.

I would suggest that we keep the key, and do a sort of Ceremony of the Keys para asegurarno que no se trague la llave el Leon.

La cosa esta que da susto, porque el Alcalde se ha quedao mudo, which is surprising porque los Spaniards cantan por todo, hasta cuando llueve.

Lo ultimo que dijo fue que el isthmus is part of the La Linea municipality, po este tío se quiere quedar hasta con los Glacis.

Give them an inch and they'll take a mile, eso es lo que siempre me decía mi tatarabuelo.

Bueno, el Chief Minestra dice que el sovereignty que no lo toque nadie, conque que se lo que hay que tocar, como no sea el Spanish guitar.

Bueno, hija, vamo a cantarle a la Virgencita de Europa for if the flies. Ciao. — Cheerio! —


What are the chances of Gibraltar winning the taxation case?

TALKING POINT

The complaint made to the European Commission by locally-registered law firm Europe Advisers about alleged discrimination of certain EU workers throws the spotlight, in an oblique way, to another EU matter affecting Gibraltar: The deision that Gibraltar's taxation must follow that of the UK.

This matter, which flows from the tax-exempt companies, led to the European Commission taking a line which the Gibraltar government sees as being something of a catastrophe for the finance centre if the EC view wins the day.

The matter has been raised in the European courts, but what are the chances of Gibraltar winning?

SO DIFFERENT

While the Foreign Office and the Gibraltar government think they are going to win, there are those in Europe who cannot understand how Gibraltar's tax laws can be so different to those of the UK, which is the member state.

In the submission regarding EU workers, it is stated that the UK has only one membership to the European Union.

"In article 299(4) of the Treaty it is clarified that Gibraltar is a part of the United Kingdom," said the submission.

And they then add that this was the EC's point of view in its decision on the tax-exempt situation.

In this decision, they add, the Commission did not support a proposal it had received from the Government of Gibraltar concerning its company taxation regime, which the Commission argued would differ from the regime in the United Kingdom.

DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE

It is important to note that such arguments are being advanced by two lawyers who are from EU countries other than the UK, which may indicate that in continental Europe matters are viewed from a different perspective to that of the UK.

If the judges who are to hear the case on the tax-exempt situation are largely from continental European countries, as indeed they will be, it could well be that their perception of things will be more European than British.

And if such is the case, what are the chances of Gibraltar winning the taxation case? And if we don't win, what?

Political Notebook

Will the Feetham factor help a third party to make inroads?

In politics you never know. Such as Dan Feetham saying he would fight Caruana and the GSD from the rooftops, and ending up joining them.

In elections you never know either. There is a notion that third parties don't make it, but there are exceptions.

Ask anyone who remembers the golden years of the AACR, the untouchables of politics. In the 1969 election, the AACR did not get their eight in, instead the Integration Party and the Isola group, one with 5 and the other with 3, were to form government.

Can it happen again?

Nothing cannot be ruled out - at the right time.

Parties who have been in power for too long start a deterioration process which they themselves do not seem to realise. This is because there is a tendency to be surrounded by 'Yes' men.

The recent PANORAMA poll caused something of an earthquake in political circles, when the GSD came out as second best.

In GSD circles they like to think this was mid-term blues. Could be, but was it?

Even at the 2003 election, that was the last election, the differences between the two main parties was not that big.

If that trend has continued, and if the Feetham factor will turn out to be negative for the GSD, will a situation be created where a third party could sneak in?

Those who are in circles which are critical of going for Labour, who seem to think that fragmentation could set in if there is a third party which is seen to be something of a force which could attract votes from the GSD.

Can the GSD be weakened to a point where they would not win the next election? Can a third party make more inroads that just knock the eighth man out?

It all depends on the strength of the GSD - the fact is that they could not win a landslide at the last election and the indicators are that an opinion poll has taken them downhill.

Feetham may have dented his credibility to be a real vote-catcher, while there are many in the GSD who would not vote for him for a number of reasons, in the same way that there are those who say they would not vote for Bossano.

So, what will the end result be? Interesting times.


Pons dice que la Laguna is Spanish...

I say, querida Cynthia, did you hear what Pons said? That la Laguna is Spanish.

Que me dices, como puede Julio Pons decir eso when he is the chairman of the Laguna association y todo?

Que tonta que eres, you must be affected by the levante. El que lo ha dicho es el Ping-Pons, el del Spanish foreign ministration que anda con los tripartite talks.

Mujer, me parecía que era una locura - aunque si eso es lo que ha dicho el Ping-Pons la locura sigue.

Ping-Pons dice que el istmus is Spanish, es decir from la verja - as he calls the frontier - to los Casemates, conque incluye more than just la Laguna.

Si eso es lo que piensa ese caballero español how can we carry on having cooperation talks with him?

Not only that, but he thinks that if we do not agree with him nuestras posturas son estupidas!

What a cachonfinger. If you ask me, if anyone is stuck in the past it is him porque he even thinks que la frontera no es una frontera!

Y con lo de los flights from Madrid, hasta el General Franco allowed los Spanish flights.

Y del Patajamon mejor decir nada. Se ha cargao a su partido so that he can join the GSD, no wonder que el Chief Minestra dice que the Labour party no longer exists.

Según me dijeron en la Caleta, los Labour members were not even consulted - la cosa huele mal, I must say.

I prefer jamon York, scouts honour. Changing the page, you can now start saving pa comprarte un affordable house, ta, ta.

Me la comprare cuando las ranas crien pelo, ciao.


The European status of Gibraltar

by EMILIO PEIRE

THE THIRTEENTH JURISDICTION

When the European venture comprised twelve states plus Gibraltar, Joe Bossano used to say that the Rock was the thirteenth state. Theoretically it might be thought to be. In actual fact it was the thirteenth Jurisdiction! It had the very same rights and obligations as the others; except in three specific areas, including VAT and the Common Agricultural Policy, which takes up 40% of the budget! This equal status was maintained, without any difficulties throughout the periods in office as Chief Ministers of Sir Joshua Hassan and Mr. Joe Bossano.

Since joining the Common Market Gibraltar as a separate jurisdiction though not a state has accepted the European regulations and directives that apply to it in the same manner and at similar time as any of the other jurisdictions, who were states in their own right. European Law has had to be written into the Gibraltar Law, because Gibraltar is a separate jurisdiction and is not a part of the United Kingdom. It should have equal rights and not be subjected to the bilateral impositions agreed to by the UK and Spain bilaterally!

A CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT

Prior to the election of the Gibraltar Social Democrats, Gibraltar shared in all European rights, benefits and obligations without any interference from any of the other Jurisdictions, who were all independent states. But, with Mr. Peter Caruana in office, the Spanish Government has succeeded in excluding Gibraltar from conventions, thereby denying its rights and benefits. Incumbents at the Palacio de Santa Cruz, incessantly monitor all European proposals and interfere to deny us the benefits through the simple fact that we are not a state. At the same time the Spanish Commissioners, well supported by the Spanish Foreign Ministry, press for unreasonable prompt execution of all our obligations. All this with an apparent tacid approval of the British Commissioners, the Foreign Office, and worst of all the frustrating ineffectiveness of our own Chief Minister, whose well publicised initial objections and promised action come to nothing in the end.

The ever busy public relations spinning machine of the Gibraltar Government attempts to create public resentment against all but the very man, who, through fear of confrontation, weakness or by design invariably succumbs to injustices and illegalities perpetrated against Gibraltar. A man who, ironically could have universal support from the Gibraltarians and British public opinion if he challenged the Foreign Ministers to adopt the Wellington Way(1) and stand up against the Spanish Government for the way they have contrived to undermine our European status, trampled on our interests and ignored our wishes.

THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

One has only to read the recommendations in of the Foreign Affairs Committee over the last few years to confirm the above.

The Fourth Report of Session 1998-1999 states:

(23) We conclude that there have been occasions in the past when the British defence of Gibraltarian interests has not been so robust as it should have been. Of all our overseas territories, Gibraltar is in the unique position of having to conform to almost all EU regulations and directives. This means that the British Government have a special duty of care towards Gibraltar in the European Union, and places extra responsibilities upon the United Kingdom Ministers to uphold the interests of Gibraltar. We urge Her Majesty´s Government both to recognise and to act in full accordance with these responsibilities

The Eleventh Report of Sessions 2001-2002 states:

(e) We concluded that the Government was wrong to negotiate joint sovereignty when it must have known that there was no prospect whatsoever that any agreement on the future of Gibraltar which included joint sovereignty could be made acceptable to the people of Gibraltar, and when the outcome is likely to be the worst of all worlds - the dashing of raised expectations in Spain, and a complete loss of trust in the British Government by the people of Gibraltar.

The same could be said of the present various levels of talks in progress and planned.

If our economy has continued to grow it is only because of the Spanish persistent all pervading propaganda against Gibraltar. The Spanish media has constantly complained of Gibraltar as a tax free territory and a haven for dubious capital where everyone profits by registering companies, etc. It has served to attract to Gibraltar millions of intrigued European visitors. This has been followed by investment capital from all quarters, which was previously just pouring into the Costa towns like Marbella! Some wise person once said that there is no bad propaganda. In the case of the Rock it has been proved true.

THE NEED FOR CHANGE

Our present predicament in the European Union especially the fact that everything affecting Gibraltar is now processed in a bilateral way by the United Kingdom and Spain must be resolved. A Gibraltar Government, well supported by “groupies” must face up to this challenge. It must lobby the British and European Parliaments and inform public opinion in Europe in order to reverse the trend and recover our standing in Europe. Our Government should ensure that European Members give back to Gibraltar its rightful status as a separate jurisdiction in Europe and our little country must then stand or fall on its merits under the critical but honest eyes of the United Kingdom and Europe.

The constitutional talks must replace ministerial talks with Spain. The latter will only lead to greater evils locally. They give false hope to Spain without any reason and they do not have the indispensable support of the Gibraltarians. One cannot see our present Government even attempting this.

(1). The Wellington Way: "YOU MAY RELY ON THIS, THAT IF YOU TAKE A FIRM AND DECIDED LINE, AND SHOW YOUR DETERMINATION TO GO THROUGH WITH IT, YOU WILL BRING THE SPANISH GOVERNMENT TO THEIR SENSES, AND YOU WILL PUT AN END TO THEIR PETTY CABALS"

WATCHDOG

By Joe Carseni

No improvement in day-to-day running of St Bernard's Hospital

On the 15th March this year, I wrote about the new St. Bernard's Hospital. I praised the GHA for a job well done on the transition from the old to the new. However, I also did mention that although this hospital was equipped with high technology and cosmetically beautiful, it had to be run with strict professional ethics.

Based on my own experience, I can now tell you that I see no improvement in the day to day running of St. Bernard's. I find that with the exception of a few staff members, the majority still show signs of very un-professional approach towards patients and lack of hygienic practice which should be a must and a priority in hospitals.

NO DOCTOR

Last week, we were a total of three patients that had knee arthroscopy done. No surgeon or doctor came to do their post operative round to re-assure and explain to us what was done and/or what discrepancies were found in each case.

The following morning, the charge nurse came with a little brown card telling us that we could now go home but that we would have to go to the records office on Monday to schedule an appointment with the surgeon in two weeks.

In other words, this unprofessional attitude that originated from the surgeon was reflected down onto the nursing staff with no concern for the patients.

First of all, the appointment should have been made there and then by the nursing staff without having to inconvenience the patient.

In addition, when we were discharged, we were offered no wheel chair assistance to the entrance of the hospital. Just think of this.... Three knee operations and made to walk from the orthopaedic ward to the hospital's main lobby.... This is quite a long walk especially for anyone that temporarily has lost the mobility of one leg.

CONTAMINATION?

Intravenous needles were removed and placed on one of the seats right there in the ward. These needles were soiled with blood, something that in this day and age where AIDS is a great threat to human life, adequate measures should and must be taken to avoid contamination.

Breakfast serving personnel serving Wheatabix cereal placing portions bare-handedly on the plate. Have these people gone through any kind of training?

Nursing staff by their counter, continuously talking to each other at the top of their voices without any consideration for those nearby patients who have to overhear all kinds of personal and job related negativism towards their employers (The GHA). Management is totally responsible for this attitude and if charge nurses allow themselves to be drawn into these types of discussions, how on earth can they set example to others?

CODE OF ETHICS

We all know the saying "Familiarity breeds contempt" This is something that both Mr. Britto and the CEO should emphasize to their management staff to ensure that a code of ethics and professionalism be strictly adhered to. Nursing, besides being a profession, it requires at the same time, an element of vocation. The absence of one without the other is not conducive to good performance of duties.

Televisions not in working order.... but most important, there were blood pressure taking apparatus that continued to malfunction.

RAN-AROUND

Mr. Britto and the CEO should make sporadic calls to the hospital from an outside line so that they can see for themselves that they either cannot get through or the caller gets the biggest ran-around of their lives. Telephone switchboard is the lifeline to any kind of business but to hospitals where human lives are concerned, there is no excuse at all for the lack of prompt answering and/or transferring to the proper departments, which incidentally, these too show little or no interest in answering.

I will continue to constructively criticize the GHA in the hope that top Honchos will come up with an answer to better both the quality and calibre of service to those unfortunate people that have to depend on services that need and must be improved on.

POLITICAL NOTEBOOK

by Onlooker

Not Gibraltar's problem

The Chief Minister has been saying in the past that the EU Tax Savings Directive, which means that London has to be provided with details of bank deposits, could be a bad thing for Gibraltar. He has been saying he will have none of this.

Certainly because Gibraltar is part of the UK for EU purposes, there is no need to inform London. The same does not apply to the Channel islands and the Isle of Man who are not in the EU and have entered into a separate agreement with the UK.

But they see a great benefit for their finance centre threatened, if they have to inform London and we do not have to.

If there is a problem it is a problem between the UK and the islands. What has that got to do with us?

If Gibraltar stands to benefit from its EU membership - and about time too! - then we should not be made to give up that benefit, much less should the chief minister come out saying that he is happy to sign away our EU rights.

No to claim, yes to self-determination

A vital difference between the Gibraltar question and that of Northern Ireland is that Dublin gave up its formal claim to Northern Ireland and at the same time accepted the concept of self-determination.

In Gibraltar's case the Spanish government continues with its archaic claim and denies the right of people to determine their own future.

Gibraltar must continue to fight for recognition of its self-determination AND we must not say, as some do, that Spain will never give up its claim.

If Spain gives up its claim or does not give it up, is for Spain to argue.

Our only argument must be to defend our position, which is that we have self-determination and that sooner or later Spain will have to drop its sovereignty claim which increasingly makes less and less sense in an EU context

Officials and not ministers

SDGG spokesman Willie Serfaty made a good point in his PANORAMA interview on Friday.

"We would prefer to see that at talks at the level of officials Gibraltar were also represented by our own officials who, like their UK and Spanish counterparts, would then report back to their Government," that's what he said.

Indeed, that is how it should be.

If tripartite talks give us equality, then the chief minister should only attend when UK and Spanish ministers do so.

Otherwise, what we are doing is downgrading the role of the chief minister of Gibraltar.

Likewise, when there are local talks with the alcaldes, Gibraltar should be represented by its mayor.

Otherwise, we are demoting the role of the chief minister to that of an alcalde.

The Right to our Land, pa los rico de outside the back...

Valiente lio se ha armao con esto de los Savings Tax, my dear Cynthia, y ahora quieren que Gibraltar should foot the bill porque los del Channel islands pueden perder un buen negocio.

My dear Cloti, is it not about time that Gibraltar gained something from its membership of the Uropean Union?

Claro que si, and so says the whole of our Gibraltar. Resulta que because we are in the EU no tenemos que notificar al UK Governation de los bank deposits in our Gibraltar porque siempre nos dicen que we are part of the UK for EU purposes. O no se acuerdan del sellito que ponian in our passports?

I know. Pero los de los Channel islands quieren el pan mantecao on both sides, and the UK Governation agrees. Pero when we have el bread buttered on both sides nos dicen que it is unfair y cosas de esa.

Que verdad. Yo lo que digo es que si los Channel Islands are not part of the EU y esto le afecta, pues mira que se metan en el EU y que paguen las consecuencia en otras cosas in the same way that we do.

Of course. Why should our EU rights not be upheld porque cae mal en los Channel Islands? Eso es como todo los rights, including los del air liberalization, como dice Pepe, que nos lo han quitao porque a los Spanish le cae mal.

Como lo del sport. Ahora, como dice el presidente Pardo, los Spanish en plan cafetera de presión so that we are not allowed to join los Olympics. Do we have rights or don't we?

Es que todo esto es un gran cachonfinger, como el out-of-bounds island que están haciendo en el Queensway Quay pa los ricos. Con la poco tierra y sea-front that we have in our Gibraltar, cuando se va a acordar our Governation que habernos Gibraltarians in our Gibraltar?

Cuando hagan casas for us lo harán near the airport, pa que nos quedemos sordo con el ruido de los aeroplanos, or opposite the cemetery, as if Gibraltar was not ours. No hablaba el AACR of the right to our land?

That's right, pero el GSD se cree que we have no right to our land. Y vengan pinturitas de los chief minestras y cosa de esa, que sirven bien poco, while our rights se las llevan los de fuera.

Y nos quejábamos del MOD, and our own Governation nos quita what is ours, todo el seafront and all our land, y se lo da a los outsiders, que te parece hija de mi corazón?

Como que me pongo mala Adió mi alma.

Adió blancaflo.

 

 

Expedia.com - Great rooms at Great Prices!

Search





  • Books

  • Magazines

  • Posters & Prints

Top