Panorama Logo

 

http://www.gibraltar.gi/gibnews

Shipping Supplement

This week's news by PANORAMA newsweekly, Gibraltar

7th June 1999

Fish from the Spansih trawler Piraña for RGP officers

Crates of fish from the Spanish trawler Piraña have been distributed among police officers, PANORAMA reveals today.

Members of the public who witnessed the spectacle can be forgiven for thinking that Police Headquarters was the fish market, as RGP officers unloaded the crates of fish from police vehicles and carted them into New Mole House.

The Piraña became famous when it was boarded and arrested earlier this year for illegal fishing in Gibraltar bay. Crew members were subsequently fined by the Magistrates Court and the trawler's nets, which had been seized, were later returned.

However, about half-a-tonne of fish remained confiscated and in cold storage.

Contacted by PANORAMA, a police spokesman confirmed that some of the fish had ended up at RGP headquarters and distributed among police officers.

The police said that "nobody wanted the fish" and that, over the last 2 weeks, St. Bernard's Hospital, Mount Alvernia and the Senior Citizens Club had virtually been forced to take some after much persuasion.

CRATES

There were about 50 crates in all. Those that remained went to police HQ. "Some people were asked to collect their fish from police HQ," said the spokesman.

The ex Piraña fish had been in cold storage since the incident in the bay last January "but we were going to be charged for storage, so we decided to get rid of it," said the Police.

A right royal fishy business!

CPA conference opens

A regional Conference of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association opened in Gibraltar today, by the Governor Sir Richard Luce.

Delegations attending the week-long Conference are from Alderney, Cyprus, Falkland Islands, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Jersey, Malta, St. Helena and the United Kingdom. There are also invited guests Mr. Bowen Wells MP, International Treasurer of the CPA; Mr. Andrew Imlach, Director of Information Services, CPA Secretariat; Conseiller R Berry and Dr. J Marek MP, regional Representatives and Mr. Alan Sandall, of the House of Commons. Attending as observers is a delegation from Malaysia.

The Gibraltar delegation is made up of Lt-Col E M Britto, K Azopardi, J J Gabay, Dr. J J Garcia and D J Reyes (Secretary).

Four working sessions will cover the following subjects:

The relationship of small states/ territories with the United Kingdom and/or their bigger neighbours and is there a need to improve those relationships for their mutual benefit.

Prospects for social and economic development, protection of the environment and co-operation in the 21st Century.

The relationship of territories in the Region with the European Union and/or the United Nations.

Small states/ territories and the challenges of the New Millennium/ CPA affairs.

The programme has been prepared by the Gibraltar branch's executive committee which is chaired by the Speaker John Alcantara.

Row over secret proposals

The secret proposals for a Spanish Gibraltar made by lawyer Guy Stagnetto are the centre of a political row.

Soon after details of the proposals were published here, the Government issued a Press Release denying that the report had been commissioned by the Chief Minister, as had been claimed by the Spanish 'ABC' daily.

The Press Release added: "In January 1998 the Chief Minister received from Mr. Stagnetto an unsolicited courtesy copy of a document containing his own views on several political issues affecting Gibraltar."

Mr. Stagnetto himself said elsewhere that the views were his own and that Mr. Caruana had not commissioned the report.

The GSLP/ Liberal joint committee spoke of the Government misleading the public by giving the impression that it was not aware that a report existed which suggested the need for a deal with Spain on sovereignty.

The Government responded with another Press Release saying it was disgusted by the opposition statement accusing the Government of misleading the public and the Chief Minister of being economical with the truth in relation to the Stagnetto report.

New Input/ Output Study of the Economy

*by PETER CARUANA, Chief Minister
The two greatest impediments to economic management and planning are the poor range and quality of statistics available to Government and the lack of a recent input/ output study, ie model, of the Gibraltar economy.

This not only impedes economy policy transparency in terms of the information that Government can provide to this House, to employers and to trade unions - it also prevents the construction of credible national accounts and conventional economic growth and performance statistics.

There have been two previous input/ output studies, the first undertaken around 1981 and the second in 1987. These studies looked at the economy in the context of major economic change brought about by specific extraneous factors. In 1981, it was the anticipated closure of the naval dockyard. In 1987 it was the impact of the opening of the frontier.

Since then, the structure of Gibraltar's economy has changed significantly having adjusted to the effects of further, substantial defence cuts, the considerably growth in home ownership and the diversification flowing from the development and expansion in financial services, tourism and port activities, including the post GSP contraction in shiprepair activity. The economy has therefore not only undergone continuous major change but has also been increasingly exposed to market forces such as fluctuations in interest rates (which in real terms remain high) and the relative strength of sterling, notably against the peseta. It is also increasingly exposed to the impact of, what I may call, external institutional pressures or changes which increasingly interfere with the direction and workings of the domestic economy. These include EU measures and legislation dealing with issues as diverse as the environment, health and safety, workers rights, and tax harmonisation agenda.

POLICIES

In such a situation it is all the more important in order to determine optimum economic policies to be able to analyse each sector of the economy and the way in which they interact with each other.

The Government has therefore commissioned economic consultants to undertake a further input/ output study of the Gibraltar Economy. The purpose of the proposed study is to provide a detailed model that will simulate the behaviour of the Gibraltar economy in response to a wide range of influences. It will enable Government to analyse, plan and measure the economy, the effectiveness of medium and long term strategies and policies and to predict the likely impact of changing circumstances and conditions.

The Input/ Output study which will take around a year or so to complete, will form an important quantitative basis for that strategy. The study will measure the economic significance and the impact of change in each of Gibraltar's sectors of final demand, that is, the direct and indirect changes in the level of activity relating to sectors such as financial services, tourism, port activities and the Ministry of Defence. The model will however be refined to produce a micro-economic assessment of the nature of the different activities within each sector. In the tourism sector, for example, it will be possible to measure the relative income, employment and fiscal benefits within the visitor mix to Gibraltar. Similar analyses will be made for changes in final demand to the different types of activities in the finance sector or the different forms of port activity from bunkering to shiprepair and marina activity.

*From Budget speech

BUDGET POINTERS

FIGURES DO NOT TALLY
Opposition leader Joe Bossano has accused the Government of indulging in self-congratulatory remarks but of failing to attach importance to analysing their own figures, claiming that official figures did not tally.

He questioned that the private sector was doing well, adding that £5 million in import duty was not a reflection of increased trade - much of it being from tobacco duty.

The Government finances today are "as healthy or as unhealthy as they were in 1966 when Mr. Caruana said they were in a state of disaster. If anything, they were marginally lower than in 1996."

'MADE TO MEASURE' FOR TRADE

The TGWU has described the Budget as "made to measure" for the Chamber of Commerce and the Gibraltar Federation of Small Business, contrasting what they term as a very small increase in personal allowances for the working class compared with what has been awarded to companies.

GOVT AND TGWU DIFFER

The Government says it is "most surprised" at the TGWU reaction to the Budget.

It is not clear what interest of the TGWU's members is served by the repetition of the opposition’s statement that the £5 million increase in import duty is not as a result of companies importing more goods, nor an upturn in performance, but by increase in the import of tobacco, and gambling. Gambling has nothing to do with import duty."

FANTASY WORLD

Questioning the credibility of Government figures and policies, opposition spokesman on tourism and commercial affairs Dr. Joseph Garcia said that Government was painting "an extraordinary picture, a combination of Alice in Wonderland and Peter Pan with the Chief Minister presiding over the stream having tea with the Queen of Hearts unaware that this fantasy world that was promised was and remains very distant from the harsh day to day reality of life."

SCHOOL HOURS

Head teachers remain unanimous in their resistance to change in school hours, said education minister Dr. Bernard Linares.

NO SUBSTANCE

The Government substitute "logic by denigration and clarity by vilification", said opposition education spokesman Joshua Gabay. He accused the Chief Minister of being more interested in the surface of things than substance, implying the continued reliance on income from tobacco.

FAIRYTALE

"Despite the fairytale depicted by his propaganda machine, which is more and more verging on the undemocratic, nothing new has happened in the economy in the last 3 years, which can be attributed to a GSD policy initiative," said GSLP government services spokesman Juan Carlos Perez about the Chief Minister and his government, adding that it was an illusion created by the GSD that frontier problems would disappear if they got elected.

LOTTERY-NO LUCK

The performance of the lottery was very disappointing in terms of forecast outturn which was very much below the traditional figure of about £500,000, said Govt Services minister Ernest Britto. Lottery returns continue to average 30%.

Passporting to nowhere?

PANORAMA revelations cause sitr in finance centre
Last week's PANORAMA revelations about the threat to insurance passporting, and the withdrawal of an application by Norwich Union, to deal in Spain and Portugal, spread throughout the finance centre like wildfire.

Shortly after PANORAMA had hit the streets, leading lights in the finance centre were ringing each other with the question: Have you seen what PANORAMA has published?

Lawyers and others were seen walking about clutching a copy of Gibraltar's popular newsweekly, while the report became essential reading in many offices.

Since passporting has been hailed as a major breakthrough for the finance centre, allowing companies to base themselves here and operate across the EU, the news that Norwich Union had withdrawn their application under pressure shocked the Rock.

Insurance passporting was recognised as long ago as 1997 - and, in practice, it has still not taken off.

An exchange of correspondence obtained by PANORAMA showed that Norwich Union had been forced to withdraw their Spain application when the Foreign Office offered two courses of action which chief executive Paul Savignon found "unpalatable" to quote the Foreign Office. Mr. Savignon said it was with "the utmost reluctance" that he had acceded to withdraw the application and warned of the implications that further reneging by Britain will have "for the commercial relationship that exists between Gibraltar and Norwich Union."

In a letter to the Financial Services Commissioner an astounded Mr. Savignon said that Britain’s reluctance to overcome such problems is serving to undermine the development and credibility of the finance centre.

As soon as the PANORAMA exclusive became known there were those who, instead of assessing the seriousness of the situation disclosed, were more eager to establish how PANORAMA had got its totally accurate information.

This whole episode transcends Norwich Union and has repercussions for the industry as a whole. It is a matter of extreme public importance for Gibraltar as a whole, and not whether it is in favour or against a particular company.

Last February it was announced that Norwich Union International was setting up in Gibraltar following "recent initiatives by Government particularly towards clarification of our position in the EU... especially the achievement of passporting for locally based insurance... which have undoubtedly been catalysts in Norwich Union's decision making process," said Mr. Savignon at the time.

It was the first step to establish a pan-European operation through which the company will be able to exploit niche markets in Europe and the Mediterranean region, the public was told.

The company was to take full advantage offered by insurance passporting by initiating applications to a number of EU countries - applications that have hit a brick wall.

WHY IS IT THAT GIB FOUNTAINS DON'T WORK?

Extract from Ronnie Barabich's Town Topics article
Regrettably the Waterport fountain, more affectionately, or commonly, known in Gibraltar as "La fuente del capullo", even if the "capullo" was removed some time ago, has recently again been the scene of controversy; the last occasion being the celebration of the win of Manchester United FC against Bayern-Munich in the European Cup, to which I referred last week in this column, as did the Royal Gibraltar Police in a statement on the incident published recently. In view of the incidents which are staged at the fountain occasionally, I suppose one could be justified in continuing to call it "la fuente del capullo", longer after "the bud", which gave it its nickname, was removed from the centre, and the fountain's plumbing and waterworks re-designed, I understand by Lyonnaise Des Eaux (Gibraltar) Limited at their own expense.

Since I have referred to the "waterworks", I might as well add that these seem to be as much time non-operational as working. Somehow, although we only have two or three public fountains in Gibraltar, we seem to have chronic technical difficulties, which we are unable to overcome and which result in the fountains in question spending as much time dry as in working order. Among these public fountains can be included, the small one erected by the Lions Club, situated in front of Southport Gates, and the one which was re-produced, at the expense of Shell Company of Gibraltar Limited, some years ago, using some of the parts of an original fountain which used to be in Commercial Square (now John Mackintosh Square), and later against the wall at the north end of Line Wall Boulevard, and finally at The Piazza.

With regard to this latter fountain, it was only operational for a short time in its new location. Then a local gardening company took over responsibility (on a voluntary basis, I think) and they eventually also gave up trying to keep it working, the decision then being taken to fill it up with plans and flowers, which was probably the best thing to do in the circumstances. The only other public fountain I can think of, is the one in the area under the bridge at the Alameda Botanical Gardens. I do not know whether this one has followed the fate of the others and is also "dry".

In contrast, two private fountains I can think of, namely the one at the entrance of the International Commercial Centre, and the one in the patio of Cornwall’s Centre, have been operational for quite a number of years, although the latter has recently also been dried and filled up with plants and flowers very much as was done with the Piazza fountain, although I understand that in the case of the Cornwall's Centre fountain, this step has been taken, not because of any problems with the plumbing or the water-flow, but because children continuously threw things into it dirtied the water.

But reverting to the Waterport fountain, I think it is about time it should be done away with in its present form., but not because it is misused by some people, as whatever fountain is put in its place, will on occasions be misused by those elements. It happens in Trafalgar Square on New Year's eve and on other important occasions when London wants to celebrate.

I seem to recall that this fountain, which was designed by the late architect, Natalio Langdon, in the days of the City Council circa 1963, was constructed with a very limited funds, and consequently what was produced, perhaps rather unfairly on Natalio Langdon, immediately became the subject of adverse criticism, which persists to this day. Be that as it may, it was the only, more or less working, public fountain in Gibraltar.

Since those days the area around Waterport has seen considerable improvement and embellishment. Furthermore the present Government is currently engaged in following on from where the GSLP administration left off, and possibly even improving and extending, the upgrading of the whole area from the North Mole to join the works at Casemates. In this context there is a crying need for the Waterport fountain to be removed and something more dignified and in keeping with the new standards that are being achieved in the area. As far as I know there are no plans to do away completely with the fountain. If I have got my facts right, a monument to commemorate “The Evacuation” is to be erected, but I believe this will go up at the centre of a new roundabout to be provided at the west end of Waterport Road where it branches off to North Mole Road and the old commercial wharf, there the "Mons Calpe" and Algeciras ferries used to berth. I am not necessarily saying that instead, "The Evacuation" monument should be erected where the Waterport fountain now is, as in my opinion it would be "more refreshing", if I may be permitted the pun, to have a fountain there. But please let us have something more worthy at the at the entrance to the town. Something akin to the big fountain at La Linea's Plaza de la Constitucion is what should be aimed at. Surely if they can do it, so can we.

Transhipment plan in Portugal 'in preference to Gibraltar'

SINGAPORE-based international port operator PSA Corp has acknowledged that it has been in talks with Portugal's Port of Sines aimed at setting up a container transhipment hub which would compete with Algeciras as a "line linking" centre.

PSA is also understood to have considered Gibraltar as a potential hub but a Lloyd's List report has quoted at the port's commercial director Luis Arroz as saying that port authority president Eugenio Borralho had been in Singapore talking to PSA officials last month. He added: "Talks are progressing and we can expect some news early next month. PSA is interested in a major transhipment port for Sines." He expected an announcement is expected by mid-June on a deal to build a container terminal with an eventual capacity of 1.3m.

Responding to the report a PSA spokesman said: "We have been talking for the last one-and-a-half years, but no agreement has been reached." PSA has said it is looking for at least a third of its revenues to come from from overseas ventures by 2007 as it looks beyond Singapore's shores for growth opportunities. At any one time it is in discussions with several overseas ports but only a small proportion of these lead to firm projects.

The attraction of ports situated close to the Strait of Gibraltar for global container lines is that they can be used to link the main East-West and North-South container routes.

CALENTITA - Gibraltar’s National Dish

Extract from the telephone conversations of Cloti & Cynthia

Pescaito frito for the Police and support for Guy from his cuñao...

Oh dear, this is looking like a long, hot summer. El Guy con su arreglito, los politiquillos involved in a verbal warfare y ahora me entero que el Royal Gibraltar Police have spent the weekend comiendo pescaito frito from el Piraña, el barco de pesca from Spain que tantos headaches le dio.

Los del Piraña eran los malos, pero su fish es bueno! Blimey con los malos ratos que pasaron in our waters RGP launches corriendo detras del Piraña, which was described hasta por el Navy as the trouble-maker of the Spanish armada.

Como se entere my darling husband se pone frito.

Frito esta mi Juan desde que se entero del arreglito proposed por el Queen's Counsel de Guy Stagnetto. Que callaito lo tenia, cariño.

A salido a su favour el Andlaw, so I don't know si es una locura de Verano. Dice que it is very imaginative!

My dear, que tiene de imaginative un solution to make Gibraltar Spanish. Mind you, I am not surprised que salga el Andlaw a su favor, after all es su cuñao.

Oh well, todo queda en familia. Anyway, a poquito poco we are getting to know de que pie cojea cada cual.

What’s On

7th to 25th June Gib Photographic Society, Exhibition Events

8th to 10th June Stylos Dance Academy show at the John Mackintosh Hall theatre, for further details contact Lilian Neale on Tel: 42896/ 43498.

Tuesday 8th June Queen's Birthday Parade rehearsal at the Naval Ground, Queensway at 9pm.

Wednesday 9th June The Gibraltar Heritage Trust, a talk by His Lordship the Bishop Rt. Rev Charles Caruana at the Charles Hunt Room, John Mackintosh Hall. "One aspect of the effects of the peninsular war on Gibraltar". At 8pm.

Thursday 10th June Gibraltar Heritage Trust "Exploring our deepest Heritage - In the beginning..." A talk by Dr. Clive Finlayson at the Charles Hunt Room, John Mackintosh Hall at 8pm.

Friday 11th June Queen's Birthday Parade at 6pm.

Saturday 12th June Marina Bay market, from 12pm to 6pm.

This information is subject to change without notice

PANORAMA ONLINE - Letters To The Editor

The following letter are published in the printed edition

Promises
I couldn't believe my ears, so I had to read about it, and sure enough there it was, the "Belgian food scandal."

I thought to myself, 'gee, it must be open season on Europeans!'

Something similar happened in Spain back in 1981, toxic cooking oil. But it wasn't just Spain, then there was Austria 1985 anti freeze in wine, France 1992-1995 listeria in cheese, and the UK's 1986 mad cow disease.

Recently Sr. Casco made his presence felt in the Campo de Gibraltar. In a vote winning exercise for the weewee party, he made it known that the proposed new Airport for the region would in no way benefit the Gibraltarians. Following in Casco's steps we hear Sr. Pique’s rambling about some incident involving a Spanish war ship and a Royal Navy patrol boat.

It has taken democratic Spain some 20 years for its centrist government to show some interest in the Campo de Gibraltar. At this stage its all promises. Maybe the GIL element has more to do with all this unexpected attention to the Campo, rather than British Gibraltar. The people from the Campo should never forget how much they owe Gibraltar and what Madrid did to them some 30 years ago, and to La Linea’s bread winners only recently.

It is frightening, I mean Belgium with its capital Brussels, Seat of European Power. Is there a European law against the poisonous, divisive, hate promoting gibberish of self centred politicians?

Manuel Correa

Australia.

All letters must include name and address of sender, although pseudonyms are allowed at the Editor's discretion. Views expressed are those of the correspondents and not necessarily our own.

E-MAIL TO PANORAMA
PANORAMA welcomes letters from the many readers of its electronic edition.

If you have anything to say, e-mail us. Some of the comments will be published.


Pages Created and Maintained by
Panorama Limited / ©1999 PANORAMA
E-Mail: gibnews@gibnet.gi

The meeting place of continents

GIBRALTAR SHIPPING SPECIAL

10 May 1999

Shipping updates

INDEX TO ARTICLES
Charting a course into the 21st century
Flying the flag
A Good Place to Arrest a Ship
CRUISING TO SUCCESS
Cammell Laird breathes new life
Good location, good prices
GROWING OFF-PORT BUSINESS
Volumes soar as Gibraltar becomes biggest bunker port in Western Mediterranean
Gibraltar growing as a commercial towage and salvage centre
Hard times due to stiff competition

 

Charting a course into the 21st century

Gibraltar is going full speed ahead in charting a course into the 21st century from its strategic location in one of the world's busiest sea lanes. It is encouraged by the marked resurgence in recent years in the fortunes of its port and shipping-related industries, while retaining a strong element of growth potential as only 7 per cent of the 70,000 ships that sail through the Strait of Gibraltar currently call at the Rock's port.

It is a changing scene. Building on success, a more commercially-oriented port authority is being set up, while final decisions are being taken on a major container transhipment facility. Gibraltar is already the biggest bunker port in the western Mediterranean and cruise calls are also on a clear uptrend.

Cruising has picked up after a brief glitch to the extent that limits may have to be placed on the number of passengers it can handle at any one time, conscious of the need to guarantee customer satisfaction. It was recently voted one of the most receptive destinations as well as "the most improved port facilities" in the Mediterranean. Further plans are afoot to extend its modern cruise terminal to allow for overnight stays and fly-cruises, for example.

Looking ahead, the Government will shortly be taking decisions about becoming a major container transhipment port. "I am determined that this project should come to fruition if it is commercially viable," enthused Joe Holliday, minister of tourism and transport. International interest is coming from American and Far-eastern concerns who would secure a lease on a build, operate, transfer basis.

There are several arguments in favour of this idea. Although the Mediterranean in general probably has too many ports vying with each other to be major regional hubs, Gibraltar's geographical position would enable it to fulfil a role which is open only to a few: line-linking.

A substantial portion of the containers passing through Algeciras, on the other side of Gibraltar Bay, are transhipped from vessels on north-south routes, serving South America and Africa, to those on east-west voyages through the Mediterranean and vice versa. Tangier also has hopes to develop a transhipment centre, but experts suggest that building a terminal in Gibraltar would be far more economical, though still expected to cost in excess of £180 million.

If Gibraltar did become a line-linking centre it would also probably develop a network of regional feeder services. The increased traffic through the port would boost all the ancillary service providers and would create between 200 to 250 permanent jobs once up and running. It would also help reduce the port's current reliance on the bunker market.

On a smaller scale, other land reclamation is to be undertaken to expand facilities for port operators, allowing for improved storage, supplies and the loading/ offloading of containers for the local market. Ironically, the local container business is one area which has been in decline over recent years. Ten years ago over 3,500 containers were handled; this dropped last year to under 1,000. This is a reflection of the reopening of the land frontier with Spain, resulting in a gradual shift to supplies by road.

Where volumes keep soaring is in the bunkering business, propelling Gibraltar to the number one spot in the western Mediterranean. The minister, however, is showing no signs of complacency and says there is still room for expansion. Bunker operators agree that more vessels can be handled. They have seen ships calling for bunkers rise from under 1,000 to over 3,000 in less than a decade.

Ship registry has been regaining lost ground now that Gibraltar is the only jurisdiction in the European Union, apart from Britain itself, flying the Red Ensign flag. While it is recognised that Gibraltar enjoys competent professional back-up, it is felt there is a need to change some areas of current legislation to improve competitiveness by being more attuned to the internationally recognised standards in other registers, like Bermuda and the Isle of Man.

Not without problems is the setting up of the new Gibraltar Port Authority to replace the Government-run port department. An element of resistance to certain changes could arise from the unions. The restructured administration will be headed by a chief executive who will be responsible for the commercial arm of the port. In handling marketing and generating income, he would be expected to adopt a far more proactive commercial stance than what Gibraltar has grown accustomed to. Despite recent successes Mr. Holliday acknowledges that the port is "an asset which has been undersold."

The new port authority will include a second surveyor, which is seen as a useful addition at a time when more ships want to register on the Rock.

Pollution control is an important area given the magnitude of bunkering operations. In the past it all revolved around the Ministry of Defence, but the aim now is for the port to have its own resources and to fully coordinate the newly produced pollution disaster plan.

The port is also investing heavily on sea rescue, replacing old craft by a new port launch and a smaller, faster vessel to react swiftly to any emergency. It has also taken over the provision of radio services and is to introduce a system of licences for port users - from bunker operators to ship chandlers, all will be licensed.

Certainly times of change.

 

Flying the flag

Re-establishing the Gibraltar Ship Registry as a serious choice for owners wishing to use an open registry flag has been one of the major achievements of the Gibraltar government over the past two years.

Ship registry went through a difficult time in the early and mid nineties and the momentum which had been gained in the previous decade was lost as the UK withdrew Gibraltar's authority to register additional vessels, due to concerns at the way the registry was administered. The remaining fleet gradually dwindled.

That unhappy episode is now in the past. Since late 1997 a small team, led by former UK Maritime Safety Agency (MSA) surveyor Roland Green, has worked hard to relaunch the flag and its efforts are now starting to be rewarded as numbers, though still low, begin to pick up.

Mr Green reports eight additions in the past 14 months though, as would be expected, one or two ships have left the register. He notes that the level of enquiries is picking up substantially with considerable interest from Italian and Greek owners.

Gibraltar is now a Category 1 Red Ensign Group flag. That means it complies with the standards agreed by the group and in practice follows the policies and standards of the UK's Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA - the successor to the MSA). It also has the benefit that vessels flying the Gibraltar flag are entitled to Royal Navy protection.

Ship registry is not in itself a particularly lucrative business.

Administering a flag requires experienced and qualified surveying staff with back-up personnel. Even the big registers such as Panama and Liberia generate relatively modest revenues compared to the massive amount of tonnage entered.

The real value of a register lies elsewhere. It generates business for lawyers and ship and registry firms. It also helps build up a strong maritime foundation by gradually increasing shipping expertise. If other things are right, shipping companies using the register may see the advantage of setting up offices in Gibraltar.

There are, says Mr Green, several reasons why owners should consider flying the Gibraltar flag. One of the most compelling is that Gibraltar is within the European Union, allowing its vessels to operate in the EU cabotage trades. Apart from the UK, Gibraltar is the only Red Ensign Group member within the EU.

Also Mr Green stresses that, while ensuring standards are not compromised, the Ship Registry staff do their best to make it easy to register vessels by providing an efficient and responsive service.

Charges for the register are kept at a "reasonable" level while a range of different types of registration is on offer: full, bareboat charter, provisional and ships under construction.

Gibraltar follows the UK's manning requirements which now have very few restrictions on nationality. Certificated officers must hold either a UK certificate of competency or a Certificate of Equivalent Competency. The position of master of some types of ship - large passenger vessels, Ro-Ro ships and product and chemical tankers - is restricted to nationals of certain countries.

This all adds up to a package with few restrictions of concern to a good quality operator. Mr Green says: "This is not a 'flag of convenience'."

The Ship Registry follows the MCA in only taking ships in class with certain classification societies. These are: Lloyd's Register, American Bureau of Shipping, Bureau Veritas, Det Norske Veritas, Germanischer Lloyd and Registro Italiano Navale, all of which have British based committees.

That means, for example, Gibraltar cannot accept vessels classed with the Japanese classification society Class NK.

The MCA has recently audited the Ship Registry. Its findings are likely to be known at around the time of the annual Red Ensign Group conference which will be held in Gibraltar on May 25-27.

The relaunch of the Gibraltar Ship Registry has gone well so far. It is though a long-term project which will require sustained effort.

In Gibraltar PSC inspections are currently carried by the Port Department. If the administration of the port is restructured, as is likely, there could well be a case for bringing all ship survey and inspection matters under one administration, as is the case in the UK.

On the commercial side one local lawyer warns that Gibraltar's EU advantage may not last for ever. Sooner or later Malta and Cyprus, both with strong and established open registers, are likely to gain EU membership. He says that makes it vital to establish and reinforce Gibraltar's reputation for quality and service now before competition increases.

In the short term, though, it looks as though Mr Green will be kept busy as more owners of vessels ranging from drilling rigs to feeder container-ships come to the Ship Registry.

 

A Good Place to Arrest a Ship

To the outsider it may seem strange that a port would want to promote itself as the ideal place to arrest a ship. Gibraltar does just that, and with very good reason.

At any one time there could be, typically, ten ships under arrest in Gibraltar, usually either berthed at the Detached Mole or at anchor in the Eastern Anchorage on the opposite side of the Rock to the harbour.

Arrested ships mean business for Gibraltar's numerous lawyers, for agents, tug companies, even pest control services and sometimes for the dockyard too. And it certainly means plenty of hard work for admiralty marshal Katherine Dawson.

In addition crew changes normally have to be arranged for arrested ships before departing under new ownership. Crews and superintendents may have to be put up in local hotels.

So it is understandable why Gibraltar wants ships to be arrested in its port, if they have to be arrested at all of course. But it is a commercial fact of life that sometimes owners do default on ship mortgages, ship suppliers do have legitimate claims against vessels, charterers have genuine grounds to arrest ships as security in disputes. Gibraltar is keen to stress the positive role it can play by providing a quick and efficient place to carry out an essential part of shipping business

Tony Christodoulides of law firm Marrache & Co says Gibraltar owes its popularity as a place to arrest ships to being a Common Law jurisdiction and its ability to move relatively quickly. The Gibraltar Supreme Court has a track record of hearing cases quickly and uncontested ones are dealt with in a matter of weeks. As with the English courts, it passes clean title to vessels sold by the admiralty marshal.

There are other factors too which make Gibraltar a good place for arrests.

It is of course well situated on the busy shipping lanes but it also offers low port charges for arrested vessels. In some other ports, dues can mount up very rapidly eating into the sum realised by a ship's sale. Moreover easy accessibility to London by air for crew changes and keen bunker and ship supply costs also play a part.

"Additionally, through the coming into force of the Civil Judgements and Jurisdiction Ordinance, it is now possible to arrest a vessel as security in respect of proceedings instituted elsewhere," said Raymond Triay of the Triay & Triay law firm. "This represents the single most important recent legal development."

Last year saw some 50 Admiralty actions, most of which resulted in Admiralty court sale.

This year shows all the signs of being a bad one for the main shipping markets with the dry bulk trades enduring the worst downturn for years while the crude oil tanker sector also appears to be heading for difficult times. "Admiralty work has always formed a significant part of our practice," said Mr. Triay. "Given the present state of the market this is so at an ever increasing rate."

 

CRUISING TO SUCCESS

There can be no doubt that Gibraltar's development as a cruise destination has been a major success story. The Rock's popularity with cruise passengers is such that the government is planning to implement limits on the number of vessels calling at any one time to keep the number of passengers down to a manageable level to guarantee customer satisfaction.

The chief executive of the Gibraltar Tourist Board, Tony Davis, concedes that it may seem rather strange to actually turn business away. The decision, however, makes sense as part of a strategy to secure the long-term future of the cruise business.

Over the past two years much emphasis has been put on improving the quality of the product on offer. The need to concentrate on standards and customer service was brought home in 1997 when the number of ship calls slumped to 99 and the total passengers visiting dropped to just over 70,000. The previous year had seen an all-time record of 139 calls and nearly 97,000 passengers.

The poor figures marked the end of a decade of, more or less, steady growth which saw vessel and passenger numbers more than double.

To be fair the decline was partly attributable to cruise lines switching itineraries away from Gibraltar for reasons completely unrelated to the Rock.

Nevertheless it was widely recognised that urgent action was needed to improve what had become a rather shabby image. Moreover a dispute between taxi and bus operators over the provision of tours and the standard of Rock tours had become major issues.

Much has changed since then. The appearance of the main shopping areas has been greatly improved by a pedestrianisation programme and the approach road from the passenger berth to town has been given a face-lift.

Crucially, Gibraltar now has a high standard cruise terminal. With works by local artists adorning the walls it was designed to provide passengers with a pleasant, neo-classical environment with a colour scheme evoking the Mediterranean. Importantly the terminal is capable of handling embarking and disembarking passengers.

The terminal was built quickly, using the shell of a former cargo shed, and has featured prominently in the aggressive marketing strategy Gibraltar has engaged in to win back the cruise trade.

Partly the promotional effort has involved attending trade fairs and talking to cruise operators. This campaign has not only involved government officials but agents have also been prominent in spreading the message that cruise lines should put Gibraltar in their programmes.

Other initiatives include multi-call discounts on the standard £2 per person Passenger Tax, ranging from 10 per cent for more than five calls to 100 per cent for home-ported vessels.

All this effort has not gone unnoticed by the cruise industry. Gibraltar won the DreamWorld Cruise Destination 98 award for the "most improved port facilities" in the Mediterranean and came runner-up in the "most receptive destination" category.

The promotional campaign has also borne more practical fruit. Last year the number of vessels was only four short of the 1996 record while passenger numbers passed the 90,000 mark.

This year the port is set to receive even more ships. Mr Davis says: "So far we have 183 confirmed bookings for 1999 and the actual figure is likely to be higher."

Gibraltar has teamed up with other Mediterranean cruise ports to form Medcruise (The Association of Mediterranean Cruise Ports) an organisation dedicated to promoting standards at member ports and to jointly promoting the region's destinations.

The need to maintain standards is the motive behind Mr Davis's move to cap the number of calls. He wants to restrict the capacity of ships alongside at any one time to 3,500 passengers. In practice that means one very large vessel of the sort now coming into service with the major operators and a smaller ship.

That does not mean, Mr Davis points out, a 3,500-passengers-a-day limit as it is becoming common to have ships arrive in the morning and leave late afternoon to be followed by other vessels staying until late at night.

The measure is intended to avoid too much strain being put on Gibraltar's resources, especially of taxis and guides. That would mean disappointed cruise passengers and, ultimately, unhappy lines who could, once more, vote with their feet.

Last year may also turn out to have been significant for Gibraltar's plans to become more than just a destination but also a hub port where passengers join and leave home-ported ships. In November P&O's 700-berth Victoria turned round at Gibraltar with the airport playing a central role.

George Gaggero, deputy chairman of shipagent MH Bland, says the operation was a complete success because "everybody worked together, the port, agents, customs, immigration, taxis."

Three charter aircraft were used for the Victoria hubbing operation. Mr Davis says that Gibraltar proved it can provide a faultless turnaround service to cruise ships. Some passengers took just 27 minutes to get from their aircraft to onboard the ship. He said the line had acknowledged that nowhere else could do better.

At present there are no further cruise turnarounds planned but Mr Davis is hopeful that lines will now see that using Gibraltar as a base port is a realistic option.

Although there is no doubt that there has been massive progress in developing Gibraltar as a cruise destination Mr Davis cautions against complacency. There are issues that will need to be addressed to ensure the Rock's future in the cruise business.

The government is continuing its drive to improve the physical facilities for cruise passengers. Work is underway on improvements to the passenger terminal and on resurfacing the quays used by the cruise ships.

In the longer term, though, further substantial investment will be needed in terminal facilities.

In the short term, however, Gibraltar is now able to compete strongly as a cruise destination and offer a product which is increasingly attractive to repeat cruise passengers. It is also ready and able to act as a base port for cruise operators.

 

Cammell Laird breathes new life into dockyard

Gibraltar's large former naval dockyard with its three graving docks should be one of the pillars of an emerging, commercially based economy. Since the Ministry of Defence handed over the yard to civilian hands its history has been less than happy but the past year has witnessed a remarkable turn around in fortunes which has done much to boost optimism in the future of the port as a whole.

When Kvaerner abruptly decided to leave Gibraltar about two years ago it was difficult to be upbeat about the yard's prospects. The problems of the recent past, however, tended to make people forget what the dockyard had going for it - in the right hands.

Even though several operators failed to make a success of the yard, due at least in part to political and labour issues, it enjoys considerable competitive advantages. The basic facilities, the legacy of the Royal Navy, are in good condition and include a 270 metre dock and two smaller ones of 190 metres and 150 metres.

Other assets include 800 metres of deepwater berths for alongside work and 3,500 square metres of covered workshops. In addition a mainly dry sub-tropical climate is virtually ideal for shiprepair work which can be affected by adverse weather. A tidal range of just 1 metre means there are no tidal restrictions on vessels' movements.

In addition, of course, Gibraltar is right on one of the world's busiest sea lanes, used by some 70,000 ships each year. That means planned dockings can often be fitted into schedules without the need for expensive diversions. Its position also ensures the yard is well placed to accept emergency repair work following casualties in the Western Mediterranean and Eastern Atlantic.

Put like that it is difficult to see how such a well-endowed yard could fail. But early last year prospects certainly looked bleak and the talk was of "one last chance".

Cammell Laird (CL), which had built up a strong shiprepair and conversion business on the Merseyside site of the former shipbuilder of the same name, took a 20-year renewable lease on the Gibraltar yard. It turned out to be the first move in a rapid expansion programme which has turned into the UK's largest shiprepairer.

On the Rock, CL has turned the dockyard into an instant success story. Operations director Tom Parry says the yard received nearly 400 enquiries during its first year of operation and about 150 of those led to actual contract, a very high "hit rate".

Major shipowners have been using the yard in the short time it has been back in operation including Cosco. CL has an agreement with the Chinese owner to work on its vessels if they require work while in the region although the yard would not be able to compete on price with the Chinese yards that do most of the work needed on the Cosco fleet.

Several units of the local fleet of bunker barges, tugs and similar craft have also spent spells in the yard since CL took over. Large grey ships, once such a common sight in Gibraltar, are once again being seen in the dockyard. It has won repair contracts for several British Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels. Mr. Parry sees this development as an important step in building a secure future for the yard.

So far work has been of a "bread and butter" shiprepair nature. This type of work implies fairly low margins and is vulnerable to fluctuations in the fortunes of the shipping markets. Mr. Parry notes some slacking off in the repair market during the early part of this year. He says: "Owners are deferring work right now rather than spending."

That is why CL is looking to undertake conversions. To do what it needed to upgrade the yard to ISO 9000 standard which it achieved in November. Since then it has been bidding for suitable projects.

They also plan to develop another niche market for which Gibraltar is particularly suited - the repair and refurbishment of "superyachts". These craft, which look more like small cruise liners than yachts, frequent the southern coast of Europe in summer and many of them switch to the Caribbean for the winter.

CL has already undertaken superyacht work and is marketing itself strongly in this sector. It also plans to invest in a movable cover for its smallest graving dock which will be used for work on these expensive vessels.

Already there has been speculation that CL may expand its capacity by bringing in a floating dock. That, though, would only make sense if the largest, panamax dock was being regularly used for conversions.

In the meantime they are investing in the future by taking on 20 apprentices and have set up a training facility. About 170 people work at the yard which, currently, does not use contractors.

In another vote of confidence in the long-term success of the Gibraltar facility, CL is basing its new riding crew operation Cammell Laird International at the yard.

All in all there has been an amazingly rapid change in fortunes which has had considerable beneficial knock-on effects on the port and consequently Gibraltar's economy.

 

Good location, good prices

There are few ports better situated than Gibraltar's to provide stores, spares and crew changes to the world's fleet. Over 5,000 vessels called at Gibraltar last year, mainly for bunkers, but with some 70,000 ships passing by every year there is plenty of scope to expand.

Extremely fierce competition between ship suppliers means Gibraltar offers some of the lowest prices anywhere. In fact the prices are so competitive that Paul Mifsud of ship supply firm James Molinary cannot understand how the handful of firms that remain can make realistic profits.

Mr Mifsud is determined, though, to keep the long-established firm going.

He has just set a deal to import provisions from Holland which he hopes will help his firm remain competitive.

 

GROWING OFF-PORT BUSINESS

While the number of ships coming into Gibraltar continues to grow an increasing number of vessels now take on stores and change crew members off-port limits. This has the advantage for owners that they do not need to come off hire but can pick up stores at approved rendezvous points just off the Rock.

Permission was first given for off-port limits storing in 1993 when 105 vessels used the services provided by a number of local companies using tugs and other craft. Last year 410 vessels were serviced off port limits and the number has risen further this year.

The Captain of the Port, John Prior, is careful to ensure that these operations are carried out safely.

At present there is a limit of four tonnes of cargo, but the Government is going to do away with limits. It is one of the first recommendations they are going to put in place following the setting up of a committee to make recommendations for future port operations.

Further increases in off-limits business is an aim of policy.

 

Volumes soar as Gibraltar becomes biggest bunker port in Western Mediterranean

Gibraltar has emerged as the Western Mediterranean's biggest bunker port.

The boom in bunkering calls has greatly increased the number of vessels coming into the port but competition with other ports has pushed profit margins to very low levels.

Ten years ago 932 called at Gibraltar primarily to take bunkers. Last year the number was 3,275 and indications are volumes are still increasing. That equates to over 2.5 million tonnes of bunker fuel.

Those figures leave rival ports in the Strait of Gibraltar way behind. Algeciras on the other side of Gibraltar Bay handled 1.25 million tonnes and Spain's North African enclave of Ceuta handled 0.5 million tonnes.

The big increases in volume have occurred since 1995 when 1,631 ships called for bunkers. The largest player in the local bunker market is Cepsa (Gibraltar) which supplies fuel from Spanish oil company Cepsa's nearby refinery to Gibraltar using three bunker barges run by Gibraltar-based Maritime Gibraltar. It delivered about 1.5 million tonnes last year of which it supplied 620,000 tonnes to Shell Gibraltar and 360,000 tonnes to Peninsular Petroleum, in both cases for sale in Gibraltar.

The driving force of Cepsa (Gibraltar) is its chairman John Bassadone whose company Gibunco Holdings owns half of Cepsa (Gibraltar), half of Maritime Gibraltar and 100% of Peninsular. They have a good track record.

The Texaco-Chevron joint venture Fuel and Marine Marketing (FAMM) handled some 770,000 tonnes last year, up about 300,000 tonnes on the year before.

FAMM uses a shoreside tank facility, leased from the Ministry of Defence, and previously used by Shell. The King's Lines terminal is operated by Javaoil.

Until early last year Texaco, prior to the formation of FAMM, used Vemaoil Company's barges to take bunkers to vessels. Then it switched to Aegean Bunkering (Gibraltar) which operates three Panamanian-flag tankers.

Both Vemaoil, which still operates and sells bunkers directly, and Aegean are Greek owned companies. Aegean's operations director Apostolos Manitsas says that his company employs ten Gibraltarians on its vessels. In conjunction with the government Aegean has sent six locally recruited crew to the UK for training.

 

Gibraltar growing as a commercial towage and salvage centre

Sometimes the scene in Gibraltar harbour gives the impression that nothing has changed. A large Royal Fleet Auxiliary oiler can still on occasions be seen manoeuvring off the South Mole with, apparently, the aid of five naval tugs.

Appearances are very deceptive. Almost everything has changed. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) only keeps one tug in what was once a key strategic base. The other four tugs, albeit wearing naval black and stone, are operated by private companies. Three belong to TP Towage while the other is owned by Gibunco. And there is another operator with fleet of roughly similar size to TP's, Straits Towing.

There is no hard and fast division between towage and the provision of supplies. One of Straits' tugs, the Nicky, is primarily used for taking lube oil out to vessels while the company also operates two water barges.

TP has also been involved in carrying out crew changes and taking spare parts out to vessels.

Agent and stevedore, MH Bland, also operates one tug which is used for taking stores, spares and provisions out to ships in the anchorage and to the increasing number of ships taking stores off port limits.

Gibunco's ex-MOD tug Sealyham is mainly used for naval movements, of which there are still quite a number despite the military run-down.

For many years commercial towage in Gibraltar was undertaken by UK-based Alexandra Towing. About four years ago Alexandra became part of Australian-owned Howard Smith which decided in January last year to pull out of Gibraltar.

In retrospect Howard Smith's decision seems strange though it was taken at a time of considerable uncertainty over the future, with the dockyard closed and its prospects hanging in the balance. Since the beginning of last year Cammell Laird has taken over the dockyard and consequently shipping movements at Gibraltar have continued to increase.

Nevertheless Howard Smith did get out, offering its local manager Thomas Peñalver the chance to take over the Gibraltar operation. Mr Penalver established TP Towage which currently operates three tugs.

The result of this competition is that the port is now very well served by tugs and that it can serve as a base for salvage operations. TP Towage has already attended casualties while the presence of an active shiprepairer in the port bolsters Gibraltar's status as a growing towage and salvage centre.

Both the two main tug operators profess optimism for the future. TP has experienced a busy first year and is seriously looking at acquiring an additional tug.

 

Hard times due to stiff competition

Gibraltar's agents are probably busier than they have ever been. The boom in the bunker trade means that, on average, about 15 ships call at Gibraltar every day.

The port is certainly well served by agents with a number of long-established local firms as well as two international groups - Barwil and Inchcape. Owners calling at Gibraltar have little to complain about as competition has pushed agency charges to very low levels. Those calling just for bunkers are being offered a package including agency services at no additional cost.

Not surprisingly agents are less than happy at a situation which has seen their margins plummet. Paul Imossi, of Lloyd's Agent Smith Imossi, notes that fees for a bunker call have dropped from around £600 to less than £250.

George Gaggero, deputy chairman of MH Bland, makes the same point. "There are a lot of ships coming here now but it is hard for agents. Margins have been pushed down in the past year," he says.

Mr Imossi cautions that the port has become very dependent on bunkers and if volumes were ever to dip agents would be in for a particularly lean time.

Fortunately there are other sectors which are looking brighter. Cruise calls are now back to the levels of the mid-nineties. The agents have been closely involved with the government in promoting Gibraltar as a cruise destination. Several of them have attended international trade shows as part of a marketing drive that appears to be paying off.

Worries remain however. The issue of whether cruise operators and passengers should be able to choose between taxis and coaches for Rock tours still simmers.

MH Bland operates tour coaches as part of a wide range of activities extending from agency and stevedoring to running the cable car to the top of the Rock. Mr Gaggero stresses, though, that the agents see the issue as being about the freedom of choice of the customers - the cruise lines.

There is also a feeling among agents that more lines need to be attracted to Gibraltar. This year three vessels calling regularly make up a large proportion of total calls.

Agents are however also able to benefit from increased activity in the port as resulting from the reopening of the dockyard by Cammell Laird. According to the Port Department, 66 ships called for repairs in 1998 but that number is set to be much higher this year with the yard back in full operation.

Off-port-limits storing and crew changing is another area that is growing, with some agents operating their own craft. In the longer term any development of a container port would also bring the prospect of more work for agents.

Increased ship arrests has also helped. Work required on arrested vessels can be considerable, including arranging crew changes and hotel accommodation.

In the short term, however, agents are likely to continue to struggle against downward pressures on their margins.

USEFUL ADDRESSES

Updates

"Red Ensign Group" Conference in Gibraltar

The annual Conference of the "Red Ensign Group" of British Shipping Registers was opened on Tuesday 25th May 1999 by the Minister for Tourism and Transport, Joe Holliday. The three day conference is being held at the Rock Hotel.

The "Red Ensign Group" comprises the UK Shipping register and the shipping registers of the Crown Dependencies and the UK Overseas Territories. Representatives from the Ship Registries of the United Kingdom, Isle of Man, Guernsey, Jersey, Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Montserrat, St. Helena and the Turks and Caicos Islands joined the Gibraltar delegates at the Conference, making a total of 31 delegates taking part including 5 from Gibraltar, who are led by the Maritime Administrator.

"There are many interests and issues that are common to the different jurisdictions within the Red Ensign Group. A forum such as this is therefore helpful in trying to find solution to these matters by learning from the experience of other territories. I also attach particular importance to the fast that Gibraltar can play a full part in the formulation of new policy for the whole Red Ensign Group as one of the three Category 1 registers," said Mr. Holliday.

MESSAGE FROM THE UK MINISTER

The Gibraltar Government invited Glenda Jackson, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions - who is the UK Minister with responsibility for shipping - to attend the opening of the Red Ensign Conference in Gibraltar. The UK Minister was unable to attend, but sent a message to delegates, which addresses the international quest for quality in shipping and which set a context for the opening of this important Conference.

It was read out to delegates at the opening of the 3-day conference. The message reads as follows:

I should like to thank the Government of Gibraltar for their kind gesture and hospitality in hosting this year's Red Ensign Group Conference and in welcoming to the Rock delegates from the United Kingdom, the Crown Dependencies and the other United Kingdom Overseas Territories. I am only sorry that I was unable to accept Minister Holliday’s kind invitation to visit Gibraltar on this occasion.

Quality has been a theme running through successive Red Ensign Group Conferences. As we move towards the new Millennium, the clear goal of IMO and responsible maritime nations around the world is to achieve quality in international shipping. There are sufficient international regulations in place. The challenge for administrations is to ensure their uniform application by all flag states and others who have responsibility for their implementation. I believe that this can be achieved, but only by a concerted effort in partnership with the wider maritime community.

The UK is playing a leading role in encouraging the international shipping industry to bring forward its own ideas for intensifying the growing campaign against substandard shipping. A series government-sponsored international conferences - for instance in London last December and in Amsterdam next month - have encouraged industry-led initiatives which will make the maritime market place less attractive for substandard shipping.

Much work is going on to make more and better information available on ship standards - for instance by improving the accuracy and availability of Port State Control data and by linking and opening up other databases. But better information is not enough on its own; it must be used by all those involved in the 'quality chain' to rid the seas of 'rustbuckets'.

An important link in the "quality chain" is the ISM Code. This Code is unique in that it does not introduce new technical standards, but instead requires shipowners and operators to be clear about how compliance with existing rules is to be put into effect. The challenge, of course, is to prevent ISM from becoming an exercise in documentation and the promote it as a means of developing a safety culture in the shipping industry. While the prime responsibility for implementing the Code must rest with the owner/ operator, it beholds flag and port states to ensure that it rigorously enforced. We cannot afford to be complacent.

British shipping leads by example. The high reputation of the Red Ensign enables us to play an important role in the crucial campaign to raise world shipping standards. But reputations are fragile and that of the Red Ensign depends on the group gathered in Gibraltar this week. I wish you well in your deliberations and in your continuing endeavours to retain the quality leadership of the Red Ensign Group.

Back to top of Shipping Supplement

Gibraltar Tourism and Transport Department
Duke of Kent House, Cathedral Square, GibraltarTel: (350) 74950- Fax: (350) 74943
TP Towage Company Ltd
Berth 11, North Mole, GibraltarTel: (350) 41912- After hours: (350) 72758/ (350)58236000- Email: tp.towage@gibnynex.gi
Marine Service Shipping (Gibraltar) Ltd
Suite 204, Neptune House, Marina Bay, PO Box 446, GibraltarTel: (350) 73606- Fax: (350) 76562
Triay & Triay
28 Irish Town, PO Box 15, GibraltarTel: (350) 72020- Fax: (350) 72270
M.H. Bland & Co. Ltd
1st Floor, Cloister Building, PO Box 554, Market Lane, GibraltarTel: (350) 79478- Fax: (350) 71608- Email: shipping@mhbland.gi
Intra Marine Services Limited
Suite 2, Horse Barrack Court, 9/15 Horse Barrack Lane, GibraltarTel: (350) 40714- Fax: (350) 40715- Email: intra@gibnet.gi
James Molinary Ltd
40 Irish Town, GibraltarTel: (350) 78881 /40645- Fax: (350) 75334- Email: jamesmol@gibnet.gi
Smith Imossi & Co Ltd
47 Irish Town, GibraltarTel: (350) 78644- Fax: (350) 77838
Cammell Laird Gibraltar
PO Box 858, GibraltarTel: (350) 40354 /59400- Fax: (350) 44404- Email: mail@lairds.gi
Cepsa (Gibraltar) Ltd
Europort, Building 7, PO Box 51, GibraltarTel: (350) 76170- Fax: (350) 76195