|
Government urged to seek
approval of House before agreeing to talks with Spain
It is entirely justified that many in Gibraltar should listen
to Sr Zapatero's words on Gibraltar with a high degree of
scepticism, says local Labour party leader Daniel Feetham, who
calls on Government to seek a bipartisan approach to talks
with Spain.
In a statement, he said: “It is natural and entirely justified
that many in Gibraltar, including the Labour Party, should
listen to Sr Zapatero’s words on Gibraltar with a high degree
of scepticism and be on our guard. Spanish Governments of all
complexions have from time to time tried to give the
impression that they are willing to decouple sovereignty from
talks on improving relationships in the area, only to merge
the two as soon as the process got under way.
SPAIN WANTS SOVEREIGNTY SOLUTION
"We must point out, however, that in substance the object of
Sr Zapatero’s willingness to engage is to find a definitive or
final solution to the Gibraltar dispute, and this can mean
nothing other than the sovereignty dispute."
Sr Zapatero also made clear that the process he refers to
would be a ‘bilateral’ process between Britain and Spain, and
this has not changed by his ‘willingness to hear the voice of
this autonomous territory’. Sr Zapatero is saying that he
wants negotiations on sovereignty, and would be prepared to
consider our interests, as expressed by Gibraltar’s leaders,
he said.
The Labour Party is however encouraged by the general tenor of
the Chief Minister’s response to Sr Zapatero’s statement. "We
recognise the need to not to discourage any softening in the
Spanish Government’s attitude, even if it is just rhetorical.
We note the Chief Minister’s statement that ‘open agenda’
talks are currently being looked at, presumably by Madrid,
London and Gibraltar, and applaud the statement that the
process being considered “has nothing to do with sovereignty
nor linked to it” and that “it would not be part of the
Brussels Process”.
THREE CONDITIONS
If such a decoupling is to be sustained, three conditions are
essential, in their view:
1. The Spanish Government must recognise publicly that talks
are on improved relations only;
2. The British Government must recognise the same, and to do
so publicly;
3. The Gibraltar Government must seek the bipartisan approval
of the House of Assembly on the precise conditions of any
diplomatic process suggested by Madrid and London before
agreeing to take part.
The party adds that it must point out that the Spanish and
British Government’s actions in the European context are
exactly the reverse of Sr Zapatero’s rhetoric.
BORDERS EXCLUSION
"We refer to the Gibraltar’s exclusion from the EU’s Single
Sky and External Frontiers measures carried out at Spanish
instigation and with British Government eventual approval.
These exclusions have a vital territorial significance for
Gibraltar. They have not been based on any legal case or any
consideration of European interests. They are motivated by
this Spanish Government’s unchanged policy of emasculating
Gibraltar. A reversal of these unfriendly and unjustified
decisions must be a prime objective of any talks to improve
relations with Gibraltar,” said their statement.
Meeting on 4 October? What
meeting?
The Convent has reacted to a lengthy Press release earlier
this week from the VOGG which said that they would be holding
a vigil outside the Governor's residence while Straw and
Moratinos met on 4 October.
"VOGG are of course welcome as always to make their views
known, but may wish to know that no Anglo-Spanish ministerial
meeting is - or was ever - planned for 4 October," said the
Govenor's office in an official Press release yesterday.
It adds: The Foreign Secretary and Sr Moratinos do meet
regularly, and have agreed to meet at some point in the
autumn.
There has been mention in the Spanish media that this will be
after the UN speech season which is now in full swing, thus
all pointers are that it will be next month.
The actual date? Wait for it!
Gib volunteers in Tangier visit
Volunteers from The Gibraltar Cheshire Home Support Group
visited Dar El Hana in Tangier over the weekend. It was an
opportunity to check out progress so far on different projects
and also a chance to catch up socially with the residents.
Some time was also spent with local residents who are often
supportive of the work carried out in Tangier and the group
believes that nurturing friendships is an important aspect of
the work, particularly when the visit involves groups of young
people from Gibraltar.
A series of items that would benefit the home was identified
and the local group is now in the process of attempting to
acquire these.
We are hoping to drive over in a van within the next couple of
months and would welcome assistance with the following items:
Toiletries
Incontinence pads/nappies
Fishing reels
Anti acid tablets and aspirin
Small television sets
A washing machine
The group is also hoping to find suitable volunteers prepared
to spend blocks of 2 weeks at the home teaching English as a
foreign language, assisting with medical and nursing care, and
offering support in other ways.
If anyone feels they can help out or would like further
information please contact Mark Montovio on telephone 40338.
Gibraltarians have already spoken, Opposition tell Zapatero
Reacting to the remarks on Gibraltar at the UN by Spanish
prime minister Rodriguez Zapatero, the GSLP/Liberal Opposition
considers that it is surprising that the Spanish Prime
Minister should say he wants to hear the voice of the
Gibraltarians, in the context of a settlement to the
sovereignty dispute between the United Kingdom and Spain,
"when the people of Gibraltar have been spelling out what they
want for decades."
Zapatero has told the United Nations General Assembly that he
wanted to negotiate with the United Kingdom to find a solution
which would benefit the whole region. He added that the "voice
of the non-autonomous territory of Gibraltar" should also be
heard in that context.
It appears that Mr Zapatero is not aware that the people of
Gibraltar have been making their views known for decades, and
that we do not want to be part of Spain in any way whatsoever.
This included a first referendum which took place on 10
September 1967 where the people overwhelmingly voted to retain
their links with the United Kingdom, and a second referendum
on 7 November 2002 where the Gibraltarians rejected sharing
sovereignty with Spain in any shape or form.
SELF-DETERMINATION
Moreover, the objective of the people of Gibraltar as
evidenced during Tercentenary Day and National Day this year,
and on countless other occasions throughout the years, is one
of decolonisation through the principle of self-determination.
Tens of thousands of people have attended political rallies in
Gibraltar in support of that objective. This remains
fundamentally incompatible with official Spanish policy on
Gibraltar.
CONSTITUTION
The Spanish Prime Minister may also not be aware that a Select
Committee of the House of Assembly was set up in 1999 in order
to draw up a new decolonising constitution. That Committee
reported in February 2002, and the document was formally
presented to the British Government in December 2003 in order
to open negotiations for the decolonisation of Gibraltar. The
constitutional blueprint, which was unanimously agreed by the
Government and the Opposition in Gibraltar, envisages a
decolonised future for Gibraltar in which Spain plays no part.
As regards Sr Zapatero's reported reference to Gibraltar as a
"non-autonomous territory", it would be very odd if he did not
know the high level of autonomy from the United Kingdom that
Gibraltar enjoys which is more than any of Spain's regional
Governments enjoy, notwithstanding the fact that Gibraltar is
a colony. We are classified as a "Non-self governing
territory" by the United Nations, which means that Gibraltar
is a territory waiting to be decolonised. Presumably, Sr
Zapatero was referring to Gibraltar's Non-self Governing
status in the UN context when he described it as
"non-autonomous".
CLEAR
"In the final analysis, the Parliament of Gibraltar and the
people of Gibraltar have made it clear for decades that we
have no desire to be part of Spain, nor do we want any form of
political association with that country," they add.
It is very peculiar that Sr Zapatero should feel the need to
hear this message once more in the context of an Anglo-Spanish
negotiating process. Perhaps it would be a good idea for the
Government to invite him here for National Day next year so
that he can receive that message loud and clear at first hand
directly from the people of Gibraltar, says the Opposition.
Will Bossano preside over House when new Speaker is confirmed?
The Leader of the Opposition, Joe Bossano, may be called upon
to preside over the House of Assembly when the House meets to
confirm a new Speaker. He is the Father of the House, which is
the title given to its longest serving Member. Mr Bossano was
first elected to the House of Assembly in 1972.
This curious development is what happens in the House of
Commons when the retiring Speaker is no longer in post.
When Michael Martin was appointed Speaker of the House of
Commons on the retirement of Betty Boothroyd, it fell on Sir
Edward Heath, the Father of the House, to preside over the
session as Chair. This happened even though Heath belongs to
the Conservative Party, which is the official Opposition, and
not to Blair's governing Labour Party.
It will be recalled that Judge John Alcantara resigned as
Speaker of the House of Assembly with effect from 4 August.
This means that the retiring Speaker is not in post in
Gibraltar and therefore cannot preside over the confirmation
by the House of his successor. The procedure of the House of
Assembly follows that of the House of Commons when local rules
are absent.
There is nothing in the Constitution as to the procedure for
the confirmation of a Speaker by the House of Assembly, once
that person has been appointed by the Governor. The rules of
the House point to a Speaker presiding or in his absence an
Acting Speaker In the absence of a Speaker and an Acting
Speaker it allows for "such Member of the Assembly as the
Assembly may elect for the sitting" to preside. However, this
logically assumes that the Speaker and Acting Speaker are
absent, and not that the office of Speaker has been vacated
completely.
The Attorney General has, in the past, been the officer
entrusted with reading out the Governor's instrument of
appointment of a new Speaker, but he does not preside over the
session himself. When Bob Peliza took over from Alfred
Vasquez, for example, it was the latter who presided. The
difference is that the abrupt nature of Mr Alcantara's
departure, for reasons which are well known, has not allowed
for a smooth transition to take place and the House of
Assembly now finds itself in unchartered waters.
House of Commons procedure suggests that the Governor, in the
name of Her Majesty, may have to call on the Father of the
House, Opposition Leader Joe Bossano, to Chair the session
where the House will confirm Haresh Budhrani as its new
Speaker, even though Mr Bossano and the Opposition will be
voting against him.
Invincible task group in Gibraltar tomorrow
A task group consisting of HMS INVINCIBLE, together with the
Destroyers HMS SOUTHAMPTON and HMS MANCHESTER, sailed from UK
on Monday to take part in a large scale NATO exercise based
around the island of Sardinia in the Mediterranean.
HMS INVINCIBLE and HMS MANCHESTER will arrive in Gibraltar
tomorrow. HMS SOUTHAMPTON is expected to arrive 24 hours later
and the 3 ships will remain for a short while conducting
routine business before heading into the Mediterranean.
Exercise
The exercise will consist of live-fire training and will
include forces from Canada, Belgium, Netherlands, France,
Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the United States
along with Maritime and Amphibious forces affiliated with
STRIKFORNATO. The exercise will also be the first test of the
NATO Response Force (NRF) and will involve more than 10,500
personnel, over 50 ships and 50 aircraft from 11 NATO nations.
INVINCIBLE and her air group will make a vital contribution to
this force.
Busy
This will be INVINCIBLE’s third major deployment this year
which has been a particularly busy one with her exercising off
the coast of Norway as an Amphibious Carrier; re-roling as a
Strike Carrier to deploy to the US coast and now acting as the
Flagship for this trip to the Mediterranean.
In this role she will be embarking several senior Force
Commanders and their battle staffs as well as her usual
complement of Harrier aircraft from 801 Squadron based at
Yeovilton and Sea King helicopters from 849 and 771 Squadrons
based at Culdrose. The deployment will include several port
visits and will last until early November.
The Commander in Chief Fleet, Admiral Sir Jonathon Band will
be embarked on HMS Invincible and will host a lunch on board,
during the task groups short stay in Gibraltar. The Governor
will visit Invincible tomorrow, boarding whilst she is at sea
and disembarking as the ship berths.
Liberal
Democrats open Gibraltar office
The British Liberal Democrats have opened a constituency
office inGibraltar. This will be the office of the Liberal
Party of Gibraltar whichis located in Irish Town.
This follows the visit for National Day of South West Liberal
DemocratMEP Graham Watson and discussions held between Mr
Watson and Liberal PartyLeader Dr Joseph Garcia. Speaking in
the European Parliament last week Graham Watson said that
hewas proud to be one of Gibraltar's representatives in the
Brussels and Strasbourg, he also made the point that the
Parliament has to stand up for the rights of EU citizens and
defend those rights from encroachment by the EU member states.
Mr Watson is now the Leader of the Alliance of Liberals and
Democrats for Europe, which has 88 MEPs from 19 different
countries. The new group now includes regional parties from
both the Basque Country and Catalunya and is the third largest
force in the European Parliament. These parties see the
regional development of Europe as the way forward.
Commenting on the designation of the Gibraltar office, Dr
Garcia said:
"Members of the public will now be able to forward relevant EU
complaints to Mr Watson through the Liberal Party office. They
remain, of course, in the same way as any constituent,
perfectly free to do so directly as well."
Restrictions on freedom of expression by civil servants should
be lifted
The Reform Party says believes that the current restrictions
on Civil and Public servants' freedom of expression should be
reviewed. In particular, the Party emphasises the present
conditions in Gibraltar under the Official Secrets Acts and
others. It claims these are often used to restrict virtually
all verbal and written statements of opinion by public
employees.
The Reformists say they support "for obvious reasons" the
current ban on Civil Servants expressing overt Party Political
propaganda.
"However, the problem is that practically any other expression
of opinion is muzzled too," they argue.
"This goes too far. The whole situation urgently needs to be
brought up to date to reflect the changes in Gibraltar's
society over the last few decades and allow Civil Servants the
right to express views on particular issues as they arise,
provided these are not openly partisan."
" The problem" a party spokesman told PANORAMA"is not just one
of the actual limits themselves but also the ways in which
they are subjectively interpreted by officials. This personal
whim basis is unfair and inconsistent and should be replaced
by clear, unambiguous new guidelines which are both fair and
objective."
New EU Constitution "a
genuine threat to Gibraltar's British sovereignty"
By Matthew George in London
The proposed new European Constitution IS a genuine threat to
Gibraltar's British sovereignty, UK Shadow Foreign Secretary
Michael Ancram has warned.
He believes that UK Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon signalled
that this would be the case during his visit to Gibraltar for
the tercentenary celebration in August.
Now Mr Ancram, Conservative Deputy Leader, has pledged that
his party will fight to prevent any "shady deal" to sell
Gibraltar out.
His comments follow the warning last week from the European
Foundation that warned the Blair government would be willing
to trade Gibraltar for European concessions when the time is
right.
Mr Ancram followed up Mr Hoon's controversial comments - which
some felt cast a shadow over the tercentenary celebrations -
with a Written Parliamentary Question to Foreign and
Commonwealth Affairs Secretary Jack Straw.
He asked pursuant to the comments by Mr Hoon "that the
enlargement of the European Union would have implications for
Gibraltar, if he will make a statement on what those
implications are".
Mr Straw replied: "As the Government have often made clear,
enlargement will bring a range of benefits, including economic
ones, to both existing and new member states. Gibraltar with
its record of economic dynamism is well placed to take
advantage of these increased opportunities within an enlarged
Union.
But Mr Ancram revealed his doubts about this response, and
underlined his conviction that the threat to Gibraltar' future
meant it was vital to opposed the proposed new EU
constitution.
He said: "I believe Jack Straw's answer to me is disingenuous.
"It was quite clear that Hoon's remarks were aimed at
reassuring the Spanish and not Gibraltar and that there is a
Government view that Gibraltar's British sovereignty will
somehow be diluted and eventually be extinguished by the EU
with its new Constitution. This is another reason to oppose
this wretched constitution.
"Gibraltar's sovereignty is not up for grabs and is certainly
not for bartering as part of some shady EU deal. Gibraltar's
future will be decided by her people freely and fairly, and in
that they have the fullest support of the Conservative Party."
Mr Ancram's comments come in the wake of the warning from the
European Foundation last week that the "done deal" on joint
sovereignty could be revived when the Blair government thought
the time was right, meaning a "precarious future" for
Gibraltar.
Rob Foulkes, a research assistant at the European Foundation,
said while the Government of Gibraltar's insistence on its
rights of self-determination has put off a "done deal" for the
present, the Blair Government had shown it would be willing to
trade Gibraltar for European concessions when the time was
right.
The European Foundation concluded that the enemy for
Gibraltarians is not the British people, nor Parliament, nor
even the Labour Party as a whole, all of whom have expressed
support for continued British sovereignty in Gibraltar. It is
instead a core of policymakers for whom the incontrovertible
and democratically expressed will of British subjects takes
second place to the considerations of the European project.
And it adds, the anniversary celebrations must serve as a
source of strength for the will of Gibraltar, to hold out
against this new diplomatic siege until a Government takes
power in Britain with conviction in its principles of
self-determination, and pride in its British identity.
Offensive says VOGG
Now that the euphoria of 'Encircling the Nation' and National
Day is over, the 4th. October looms nearer.
After the acrimonious exchanges over the tercentenary
celebrations, 'surprisingly' brought to 'welcomed' end by
Moratinos' piece in El Pais, what can be expected from a
resumption of talks ? After asking this question, the Voice of
Gibraltar group says: "Let no-one have any illusions of a
Spanish 'enlightenment'. The F&CO aided and abetted its
formulation, with Geoff Hoon and The Convent privately
'selling' it on the eve of its publication and publicly, ever
since."
Clutching at Straws
The VOGG adds: The optimists, not forgetting those always
ready to 'clutch at any straws', will hope that the
so-much-vaunted new Spanish 'talante' is genuine, that HMG
will stand by the referendum result and that cross- border
co-operation is a reality.
The pessimists, or realists, as the case may be, are certain
that, after an initial period of fine words, everything will
revert to the 'security' of the 'status quo'.
'But once in a lifetime The longed-for tidal wave Of justice
can rise up And hope and history rhyme' to quote Seamus
Heaney.
Take-off
Moratinos has made it patently clear that he wants to take-off
from where Pique left off, i.e. joint- sovereignty. Should
HMG's 'shelving' of the proposals still prevail, then the
respective positions are incompatible.
So, will the talks be simply an opportunity to agree a
strategy to woo the Gibraltarians, with cross-border
co-operation the inducement ? With HMG's propensity to enter
into dialogue with a 'kicks por si pega' attitude, as opposed
to the Spaniards' clear-cut convictions, there is always the
danger Gibraltar will, once again, end up on the 'political'
back-foot, or worse, laden with another infamous deal.
Take care
Care must be taken that the push for collaboration with the
hinterland is not a subtle guise to distance The Rock's
elected representatives from the 'matter of state'. At best,
this will diminish to position of the Chief Minister to that
of a Campo mayor and, at worst, prejudice Gibraltar's stance
at the UN.
The VOGG has always advocated for 'normal' neighbourly
relations, based on mutual respect and reciprocity, but never
at a political price. It is the Chief Minister's prerogative
to use his best endeavours to that effect and meet whoever he
deems opportune or appropriate. Likewise, he has an obligation
to inform his fellow-citizens of the specifics of such
meetings.
Notwithstanding, there is no need for any rumblings about his
tete - a -tete with the official from Asuntos Exteriores. With
hindsight, it has to be taken in the context of the Palacio de
Santa Cruz's comment that it was merely a 'private function'.
Nobody can negate the fact that had the Spaniards gained
anything from it, a spate of jingoism would have followed,
just as it did after Jack Straw's policy statement of 12th.
July 2002.
Particularly offensive
Of all the rhetoric that has emanated from every quarter,
since Moratinos' article (even a rare contribution from the
Deputy-Governor), two things are particularly offensive to The
VOGG.
Firstly; Moratinos' condescending statement that
'Gibraltarians should not be made to pay for the UK's
insensitivity'. Well, everyone still waits in a queue, cannot
use a local mobile phone across the border, gets diverted to
Malaga via Tangier, no UEFA and no IOC, amongst other
'pleasantries'.
Secondly; The report from sources at the F&CO that 'cultural,
social and community' issues will be discussed at the talks.
HMG has no moral or constitutional legitimacy to deal with
these. Neither has it a trustworthy understanding of the
realities on the ground in Gibraltar to do so.
As far as Spain is concerned, it is none of her business. Only
House of Assembly elected members may discuss these matters at
an 'official' level with relevant representative bodies
'assisting' on a 'practical' basis, in their fields of
competence. Perhaps this is just another ingenious F&CO ploy
to entrap the Chief Minister into participating in a
negotiating process that is totally unacceptable to the vast
majority of the Gibraltarians.
Governor should speak
With two weeks to go before the scheduled meeting, The VOGG
calls on the Governor to inform the People of Gibraltar what
agenda, if any, will HMG place on the table, or more
precisely, how many of Moratinos' expectations it is prepared
to meet.
If 'His Excellency' still has any 'bridges to build', let him
lay solid foundations and not the 'mirages' to-date. Unless,
of course, he has completed the only one ever envisaged,
across which, the UK and Spanish governments will meet on 4th.
October. 'History has many cunning passages, contrived
corridors', (TS Eliot).
The VOGG will, as usual, hold a vigil at The Convent, on that
day as from 10 a.m. Should any agreement be concluded without
the Gibraltarians' consent, The Group will return the next day
with whatever action it feels is appropriate, say spokesmen
Paul Tunbridge and Julio Pons.
Charity Row
At 8 am last Monday , a crew of five police officers embarked
upon a charity row across the Straits of Gibraltar in an
endeavour to raise funds for local charities.
James Alcantara, Frank Barton, Cathel Yeats, Jimmy Noguerra
and Keith Bautista set off from the port of Ceuta in a wooden
‘Yola’, kindly loaned by the Calpe Rowing Club, and arrived at
the Calpe Rowing Club at 11.40 after having rowed across the
Straits of Gibraltar.
Accompanying the officers at sea as support vessel was motor
yacht Ocean Odesity owned and crewed by Mr Mark Reed
(Hire-U-Shop) and Mr Javier Millan.
The first Yola Straits Crossing took place on 14 August 1973
by a crew from the Calpe Rowing Club comprising Richard
Labrador, Ernest Sanguinetti, Abbey Suissa, Charlie Perez and
coxes by Francis Cosquieri. They took 3 hours 5 minutes to
carry out the crossing, the record remains.
Retired police officers
claim £3 million arrears
Police officers are claiming around £3 million in arrears from
the Government. The details of the claim and the current
situation unfolded at a meeting held last night.
Those complaining say this matter goes back a long time. They
speak of numerous letters not answered and that proper
opportunities have not been given to discuss matters as they
should.
They question a method of implementing agreements which have,
in the past, been reached accepting dismal conditions.
There was the resignation of the Police Council , with fears
of pertinent issues being affected.
There is talk of the police association being impotent to
fulfil what it was established to fulfil. There is a call for
improved representation.
Letters have been sent speaking of police officers being
aggrieved that settlement of arrears have taken place
unilaterally and without prior notification.
The Government has been accused in the past of acting "in an
underhand fashion."
The association was informed some time back that any claim not
based on parity would not be dealt with retrospectively.
The Government was told: We cannot accept that Government dos
not entertain retrospective adjustments.
"The problems which this association keeps encountering with
the official side reinforces our view that the parameters in
which this association is able to operate in are wholly
inadequate to care for its members or to deliver its
responsibilities to its members, the public or the
Government," it has been claimed.
Against this backcloth, the police retired officers' group met
last night so that those attending could hear the details of
the claim and where the current situation stands.
Borders agency: Gibraltar
excluded from EU territory but not the UK and Spain
Gibraltar’s exclusion from the EU Borders Agency at the
Spanish Government’s insistence is serious enough in itself,
since the territory of Gibraltar will not form part of EU
territory for the purposes of the Agency, whilst those of the
United Kingdom and Spain will do so, says the Gibraltar Labour
Party.
Protection
The protection the Agency will give EU territories will thus
be denied to Gibraltar, in spite of the exposed strategic
geographical position Gibraltar occupies.
Our exclusion also has a cumulative significance. It follows
our exclusion from Single Sky aviation measures and portends
further exclusions in the future in the vitally important area
of Gibraltar’s territoriality.
The pattern is clear: EU measures of vital importance to
Gibraltar arise – the Spanish Government objects to
Gibraltar’s inclusion – the UK Government objects but
capitulates – the UK Government blames the European Union.
Bilateralism
"Serious as these exclusions are in themselves, we must once
again emphasise that the European Constitution will, if
ratified, institutionalise the process of bilateralism,
whereby the gradual emasculation of Gibraltar’s position in
the EU, just as it will institutionalise the Brussels Process.
Both will become irreversible. That, we believe, is the
bilateral purpose and intent of the Joint Declaration imposed
without consultation on the Gibraltar Government, which will
be annexed to the Constitution," they add. The party says:
"The Gibraltar Government must take immediate legal and
political action. It must challenge our exclusions in the
European Court of Justice as was promised by the Chief
Minister, and it must campaign vigorously in the United
Kingdom during the party conference season to expose the Blair
Government and to enlist the support of the other UK political
parties."
Gibraltar Liberals in
Bournemouth LibDem Conference
Liberal Party delegates Steven Linares and Leslie Bruzon left
for Bournemouth yesterday to participate in the annual
conference of the British Liberal Democrats. The conference
started on Sunday and will continue until Friday of this week.
It will include a keynote speech by Party Leader Charles
Kennedy.
Mr Linares and Mr Bruzon will take the opportunity to raise
the latestpolitical developments affecting Gibraltar,
including the exclusion of Gibraltar from the External
Frontiers Agency which was confirmed last week. A series of
one to one meetings have been planned with Members of
Parliament and Members of the European Parliament, and in
addition to this the Gibraltar Liberal delegates will also
attend a meeting of the South West region, and the reception
for international guests and diplomats. During this conference
in Bournemouth friend of Gibraltar Simon Hughes MP will
officially take up his new post as President of the Liberal
Democrats.
Howe NOT coming to Gibraltar
Former foreign secretary Sir Geoffrey Howe, now Lord Howe,will
NOT be coming to Gibraltar to deliver a speech at the annual
dinner of the GFSB. It was he who signed the Brussels
Agreement with Spain, which has given Gibraltar so many
headaches.
When the GFSB announced that he had been invited to their
dinner, and that he has "graciously" agreed to come, many
eyebrows were raised. The GFSB said yesterday: "Unfortunately,
due to ill health Lord Howe is unable to speak at our Gala
Dinner on October 5th hence the event is being postponed."
The GFSB say they are presently planning an alternative event
"being a more relaxed, fun, fund raiser for late October early
November details of which will be forwarded shortly."
Off to London meeting
The Chief Minister Peter Caruana left for London yesterday to
take part in this year’s Overseas Territories Consultative
Council meeting. This is an annual meeting of all Overseas
Territory Chief Ministers, with HMG.
The Chief Minister is accompanied by Chief Secretary Ernest
Montado and returns on Wednesday.
Foreign Office
playing with words, say Rock supporters
The Blair Government has 'appreciated' the role the Rock
played in the Second World War. And 'respects' the people of
Gibraltar says the British Foreign Office today in a letter to
South West campaigners fighting for the Rock to receive the
George Cross.
But, British campaigners for the George Cross for Gibraltar
say: It is time the rock Is appreciated collectively by the
British Nation
Supporters believe empty words are no longer enough, and a
major act of symbolism and good faith by the British nation is
now required. Campaigners are demanding Gibraltar receive the
George Cross for bravery from the Queen.
A collective award to the whole people of Gibraltar for its
gallantry and loyalty to the crown over the last 300 years -
is long over due say Commonwealth campaigners.
A motion for the George Cross: At the House of Commons
The Golden Hinde Association will be hoping to meet a cross
section of MPs next month in London for consultations on a
motion in the House of Commons - calling on the British
Government to award the Rock the George Cross.
And then, submit a named application to the Queen and British
Government for the Rock to receive a collective award for
bravery in the Second World War.
Kevin Kelway Chair of the Golden Hinde Assoc said today:
"Words come cheap unless backed up with real substance. It is
time the British Government seriously did the decent thing,
and award the George Cross collectively to the people of
Gibraltar for its bravery and role in the Second World War".
"I will be attending a reception by the Gibraltar Government
in London next month. I am hoping to meet a number of MPs to
discuss a possible motion being placed in the House of
Commons".
Letter from foreign office
Dear Mr Kelway,
Thank you for your letter to the Queen about Gibraltar and the
George Cross. I have been asked to reply. I can assure you
that the important role played by Gibraltar during World War
11 is indeed much appreciated and respected. This year's
Tercentenary Celebrations, in which the Government and Armed
Forces are fully involved, are in part recognition of that
fact.
As you may be aware, The Royal Gibraltar Regiment and military
units from the United Kingdom , including the Royal Marines,
Royal Engineers, Royal Airforce, RN ships Royal Fleet
Auxiliary are taking part in a total of more than 20 events
through out the year.
Gibraltar's gallantry has also be recognised in individual
cases, such as Albert Hutchison, a Gibraltarian, in 1917, and
George Henderson in 1951. I hope that this and the explanation
in my letter of 26 January about the Criteria behind the
George Cross award prove helpful.
Yours sincerely
Matt Downing
EU-Internal
British Foreign Office
The Chief Minister, the
Governor and the Speaker
Government Press release yesterday said that the Chief
Minister did not indicate publicly the name of the person that
he intended to recommend to the Governor to be Speaker before
discussing it with him.
On 2 September, GBC reported as follows: "GBC can exclusively
reveal that the next Speaker of the House of Assembly is to be
barrister Haresh Budhrani QC. Although the appointment has yet
to be officially made by the Governor, the Chief Minister,
Peter Caruana, has confirmed that he is the Government's
choice, and that Mr Budhrani has indicated he would be willing
to take up the post."
The Government has now issued a Press release where it
congratulates Mr Budhrani upon his appointment as Speaker by
the Governor, upon the Chief Minister’s recommendation and
following consultation with the Leader of the Opposition. The
Chief Minister will move a motion in the House of Assembly to
confirm the Appointment at its next meeting.
The statement adds that now that the Governor has made the
appointment, the Government wishes to correct certain false
impressions created in the local press.
It is wholly untrue, it says, that the Chief Minister
indicated publicly the name of the person that he intended to
recommend to the Governor before discussing it with or
informing the Governor of the proposed recommendation. HE the
Governor and the Chief Minister discussed the matter fully
(including the Chief Minister’s intended recommendation) on
several occasions in late July/early August before both men
went on their summer holidays. Given the intervention of the
holiday season they agreed to delay the formal process of
appointment until their return from vacations in early
September.
The statement adds: "Nor, as some have said, did the Chief
Minister announce on GBC the identity of the next Speaker,
thus usurping the Governor’s Power of Appointment. In answer
to a question from GBC, the Chief Minister said that he
intended to recommend Mr Budhrani and that, if the Governor
appointed him the Chief Minister thought he would make a good
Speaker.
The Government adds that "Despite attempts by others to
suggest the contrary, the process for the appointment of
Speaker on this occasion has been the same as in all previous
occasions in Gibraltar’s modern history and there has been no
departure from the Constitution or long established
constitutional practice."
INCIDENT
It further adds that "it is entirely inaccurate to suggest
that the need for a new Speaker arose as a result of the
incident in the House of Assembly in which the Chief Minister
declined to withdraw a statement relating to the extent of the
GSLP Governments’ support for fast launch tobacco smuggling.
"The need for a new Speaker had by then already arisen. The
previous Speaker, Mr Alcantara had several days before that
incident already informed the Chief Minister and others that
he wished to stand down as soon after the RN Freedom Ceremony
as a replacement could be found.
"However, given recent public inaccurate remarks and comments
in relation to that incident, the Government will, at an
appropriate time and in an appropriate place, make a full
statement in relation to that incident and the subsequent
statements made in relation to it by others."
Had it been a real
emergency, who would have known what to do?
Last Wednesday morning, the unmistakeable sound of a siren
coming from the Dockyard area could be heard by members of the
public in the South District and surrounding areas. Anyone who
had missed the news on television the previous evening or had
not yet read the papers that morning would not have known that
this was an MOD drill. People must have wondered what on earth
was going on, and especially so since the siren sounds of the
emergency services vehicles could also be heard and may (or
may not) have been part of the drill.
This begs the question, had this been a real emergency, who
would have known what to do?
The Gibraltar Women’s Association says it feels it is high
time that the issue of emergency procedures are brought to the
public’s attention as has been done for every household in the
UK. We were told in a GBC Viewpoint programme on this topic
almost two years ago, that an information leaflet was in the
pipeline. There have been several calls for this from various
sectors of the public since then, all of which have so far
gone unheeded.
“We have no doubt that everything possible is being done to
protect us from unforeseen events but it would go a long way
to giving us the public peace of mind if we had a rough idea
of what to expect and what to do in the case of a real
emergency - be it a terrorist threat or an Act of God. We do
not ask for secret or sensitive information to be divulged to
us, all we ask is to know what to do if sirens sound without
prior warning. Would our children, hospital patients and
elderly be evacuated, and if so in what manner? Depending on
the threat, do we stay in our homes? Should we ensure that no
cars are used in the events of emergencies to avoid gridlocked
roads? Will there be emergency radio available to advise the
public of what to do next?,” they say.
The UK booklet commences as follows:
“The Emergency Planning Society believes that this booklet
provides valuable and common sense advice for the public, that
can easily be adapted for use in many domestic situations. The
fact that every home will have this advice can only be a good
thing. This booklet will tell you how you can help yourself
and your family in emergencies. A lot of this information is
based on common sense advice and may seem obvious or familiar
to you, but it has saved lives in the past. It will also let
you know what has been done to prepare and protect our country
in recent years.”
They would like to point out to the relevant authorities that
what is seen as being a good thing for the UK must surely also
be a good thing for us here too and we urge that this is
looked into as a matter of urgency. The booklet can be found
online at
http://www.pfe.gov.uk/booklet/index.htm
GGR Steps up "age of consent campaign"
Equality Rights group GGR is stepping up its Campaign for age
of consent legislation in Gibraltar to be equalised.
Whilst this call is nothing new in itself as we have been
asking for the equalisation of this law for several years now,
the time has now come for concerted action,” Chairman Felix
Alvarez said.
OFFENSIVE
Current law in Gibraltar is unequal in treatment, making
criminals of people of alternative sexuality under 18 whilst
heterosexual citizens are legal from age 16. "This is
offensive to anyone´s sense of citizenship and self-esteem
and, for these reasons, the European Convention of Human
Rights and its Court have now long required such laws to be
equalised," he says.
A statement adds: Whilst this obligatory change is clearly
focused on the rights of citizens of diverse sexuality, each
advance made in the area of human rights means progress all
round for the establishment of a society of respect and
equality for all and GGR will continue calling for the rights
of all Gibraltarians, whether disabled, elderly, heterosexual
common law couples, or other disadvantaged sectors of our
community.
IMPORTANT
“A year and a half ago, the Minister for Europe stated in the
Commons that Mr Caruana´s Government needed to equalise the
age of consent law in order not to breach the European
Convention. Government here responded by saying they would be
studying the matter. To this date, nothing has changed. GGR is
no longer willing to wait patiently without either
information, commitment or action on a domestic issue which
touches on the human rights of an important sector of our
people. In fact, in view of Mr Caruana´s much heralded recent
commitment to a “culture of human rights”, it is surprising to
say the least to find so much dragging of feet on the matter,”
they warn.
Dear Chief Minister,
AGE OF CONSENT EQUALISATION
I have written to you on various occasions regarding the above
subject. Indeed, I believe the last time was to inform you of
the EctHR´s 9th January 2003 judgement of L and V v Austria on
the question. In the Spring of that same year, the Minister
for Europe, in response to a question in the Commons stated
that you had been advised of the need for Gibraltar age of
consent legislation (currently 18 for gays and 16 for
heterosexuals) to be equalised in view of its breach of the
European Convention of Human Rights and its most recent
rulings. The statement added that your Government would be
“studying” the issue.
Consequently, GGR considered it just to allow a reasonable
period of Government reflection on the matter. However, almost
2 years later, we have not been advised by you in this regard,
nor have any public statements been made. We therefore have no
way of knowing whether progress is being made or not. I would
therefore be grateful to hear from you regarding your
projected plans in this respect.
As Chairman, it is always my preference to work in a
consensual manner with Government and other social agents on
matters affecting my membership, and should you deem fit to
enter into discussions on this matter I shall be more than
happy to do so. However, I have to say that GGR, under the
circumstances, considers it equally reasonable to make plans
for the stepping up of our demands in this area of social
legislation to whatever level may be necessary for enforcement
to occur.
Yours sincerely,
Felix Alvarez
Chairman
Protecting
Gibraltar's EU rights
Government and Opposition should
resign or stage boycott of the House of Assembly
Members of the public are incensed that Gibraltar should have
been excluded from the European frontiers agency which
effectively means, for now and for the future, that the
borders of the European Union end in La Linea. This raises
serious questions about a myriad of situations.
The Government itself has said that it takes "a very serious
view of this unacceptable development in an area which relates
to the crucially important issue of external frontiers."
It has added that it will not sit idly by and see the history
of our exclusion from EU aviation measures repeat itself in
the area of external frontiers.
And it has warned that it will mount an immediate legal
challenge in the UK courts as it may be advised it can.
Even if a legal challenge is mounted, that in itself is not
enough. The public is fed up with seeing our legitimate rights
being eroded and our position being weakened, time and again.
The public is fully aware that what the Foreign Office is
doing is putting their relations with Spain first. In other
words, the UK is doing what suits itself - at the expense of
Gibraltar.
In the circumstances many believe that the time has come to
take action. And the only way for outsiders to take notice of
our plea is to come out with a coordinated and agreed action
plan.
PLAN OF ACTION
This plan could include any of the following or a combination
thereof:
1) All our elected members to henceforth resign from the House
of Assembly as a sign of protest
2) Our elected members to boycott all meetings of the House of
Assembly
or
3) Our elected members to stage a boycott in the House of
Assembly of all matters European, that is, boycotting all EU
legislation, for example.
Such action would stay in force until such time as our
European rights are respected. The external frontiers of
Europe must end at Gibraltar.
There are many other issues that would flow from such a stand,
which would require careful analysis and planning to ensure
maximum effect.
The public is crying out for real action. Words alone are no
longer enough.
Any such plan, which many people say they would welcome, must
count with the support of both sides of the House in the first
instance.
EMERGENCY MEETING
There is a need for the Chief Minister Peter Caruana to
forthwith hold an emergency meeting with the Leader of the
Opposition Joe Bossano to work out the details.
Other representative bodies would no doubt lend their support
as required.
Gibraltar cannot be in the EU to have its territorial rights
eroded. We are either part of the European Union or we are
not, but a small place like Gibraltar cannot be in it mainly
for the bad and to see our rights destroyed.
Gibraltar is in the EU as a separate European territory for
whose external relations a member state is responsible. This
does not give that member state a blank cheque to destroy the
people of that European territory.
If we continue to do nothing about anything, those in the
Foreign Office who would like to see the end of our Gibraltar
will simply carry on with their policies.
The Government and the Opposition would be letting Gibraltar
down if they do nothing effective to defend Gibraltar from
further attacks, and ensure that any damage already done is
reversed. The EU meeting due next month to ratify our
exclusion from the frontiers agency must NOT ratify that
exclusion.
PUT GIBRALTAR FIRST
The Government and the Opposition have not been elected to do
nothing about the rights of the people of Gibraltar, rights
which could end being meaningless if the onslaught continues.
Both Mr Caruana and Mr Bossano have often said that this is
the land of the Gibraltarians, that this is our homeland and
that they will put up a fight in defence of everything we hold
dear.
The time to put Gibraltar first is NOW.
Gibraltar again attacked in Spain over money laundering
allegations
Gibraltar is once again being attacked in Spain about alleged
money laundering and other activities which Spanish
commentators see as being wrong and even illicit.
There have recently been reports about the use of properties
to launder money. These allegations came from the Spanish
Left-wing party Izquierda Unida who wanted the Spanish and
British governments to take measures to fight what they
described as money laundering which finds its way to the
Spanish costa.
Now, more allegations are being made against the Rock.
A report in the 'Sur' paper says Gibraltar is just 6 square
kilometres but within it, "thousands of companies hide
themselves."
Gibraltar has consolidated itself as one of the principal
fiscal paradises in the world. And the inference is that,
because of its nearness, Malaga draws much of the bad that
emerges from such activities.
UK expats settled in the Costa del Sol visit Gibraltar
frequently, Spanish police have noted.
There, says the paper, the organisations camouflage profits,
at times obtained from illicit business, though companies and
'holdings'.
The Spanish paper then goes on to speak of the benefits
Gibraltar offers - no VAT is paid and non-Gibraltar residents
derive special company benefits.
The report even complains that some banks allow for accounts
to be in Euros.
The problems arise when the Spanish police go to Gibraltar to
find out who are behind certain companies that cover-up what
they describe as 'black money'.
A judicial order from Spain is not valid in Gibraltar, said a
Spanish expert quoted by the paper. The administrator of
certain companies are just covering up the identity of the
real owner, it is claimed.
CONFIRMED: Gibraltar excluded from European frontiers control
agency
by our Political correspondent
Gibraltar is to be excluded from the new European agency for
frontiers control, it was confirmed in Brussels yesterday.
This affects land, maritime and air frontiers.
Although a political decision was taken on 30 March to get the
agency going, a problem arose as Spain was insisting that
Gibraltar should be excluded from it even though it is part of
the European union.
The relevant EU authorities called on Britain and Spain to
resolve the issue bilaterally - and once again the easy way
out has been taken, by simply removing Gibraltar from this
significantly important European accord.
In Brussels yesterday, EU ambassadors were informed of the
Anglo-Spanish decision which will unblock the difficulties
that had arisen and will now allow for the Agency to come into
force on 1 January next year.
The decision will now be ratified in the next meeting of
Interior and Justice ministers which takes place on 25
October.
World media have been giving the news. CNN said that this new
agency will assist in the application of Community legislation
and areas of control and vigilance in the EU's external
borders.
Control centres will be opened in each country.
It is obvious that Britain always buckles to Spanish pressure,
not only in this new development but also in other European
matters that should apply in Gibraltar as of right and from
which the Rock gets excluded with impunity.
Thus, the work of the new frontiers agency will not apply to
Gibraltar as if the Rock was not part of the EU external
frontiers.
Britain rides rough shod over Gibraltar's external frontiers
In the wake of its exclusion from the new European frontiers
agency, Gibraltar is concerned that its EU rights continue to
be eroded - with Britain succumbing to Spanish pressure. And
the whole issue of possible cooperation from Spain now being
seen for what it is.
"The British Government has ridden rough shod over all our
arguments and pleas not to participate without us," said chief
minister Peter Caruana.
The Gibraltar Government was informed by the British Foreign
Office last July that the UK had agreed to a limited
participation in the European frontiers agency, but without
Gibraltar whose exclusion from the agency had been demanded by
Spain.
This marked "a complete departure from the position firmly
adopted by successive UK governments, including the current UK
Government, that as a matter of fundamental principle, the UK
would not accept any suspension or exclusion of Gibraltar from
EU external border measures, including this one," the
Gibraltar Government notes.
Disgust
The government feels "disgusted" like everyone else at the UK
decision to participate in the agency, but leaving Gibraltar
out.
The Government has been taking "a very serious view of this
unacceptable development" in an area which relates to "the
crucially important issue of external frontiers." But the
Foreign Office has clearly been taking no note, as it has
totally ignored the pleas from Mr Caruana.
He said: "The external borders regime will ultimately express
the physical, geographical definition of the EU."
So where does that leave Gibraltar?
It leaves Gibraltar in a similar situation to that which has
been developing in the air transport issue, with Gibraltar
being systematically excluded from aviation measures.
Last July the Government warned that it was not willing to sit
idly by and see the history of our exclusion from EU aviation
measures repeat itself in the area of external frontiers.
At the time it said that, if the exclusion materialised, the
Government "will mount such immediate legal challenge in the
UK courts as it may be advised it can."
Since this was seen coming, the Government has had enough time
to draw up plans of action. The public expects such plans to
begin to unfold.
These are matters of fundamental principle and importance for
the future of Gibraltar.
Airport
It also raises questions about any Government plans about the
airport and aviation matters, as Gibraltar's position was
weakened by the airport deal of 1987 and is now placed in a
more difficult situation, as the airport would be outside the
frontiers of Europe - and people flying to Gibraltar, in a new
airport arrangement, would enter Europe via La Linea!
All political parties in Gibraltar feel that Gibraltar is, and
must be, part of the external frontiers of the EU, but realise
that this position is being eroded in the same way that, years
ago, there was a process of erosion of Gibraltar's aviation
rights within the EU.
Opposition parties are expressing anger and dismay.
MYSTERY OF NUCLEAR
LEAFLET
The ESG says it laments the absence of information for the
public which prevails through the current and all other
nuclear safety exercises undertaken by the MoD or those by the
civilian authorities.
On its visit aboard a nuclear submarine earlier this year, the
ESG discussed this matter at length with the MoD officials and
this was since taken up by the Commander of the Base who
informed the ESG, in writing, that a nuclear information
leaflet had been designed and agreed upon by civil and British
Forces authorities. This leaflet, the group was told, is now
with our Govt. who is responsible for its circulation among
the civilian community.
No reply
The group wrote to the Assistant Chief Secretary Mr D.
Armstrong in early August requesting information as to when
the leaflet was due to be issued. "No acknowledgement of our
letter has been received and more importantly, no evidence of
any leaflet has, as yet, hit the streets of Gibraltar," they
add.
The ESG say: It is therefore appalling for the MoD to suggest
that by carrying out its routine nuclear exercise it is
following "best practices" when the civilian population
remains in the dark as it has been for the past few decades.
We know that best practices means adopting the most up to date
safety procedures, which in this case, includes an informed
and co-operative community.
Protection
The MoD and our own Govt must ensure that the standards
adopted in the UK for protection of the population are applied
as rigorously in Gibraltar as they are in the UK, says the
group. |